The role of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in memory consolidation and reconsolidation in the passive avoidance task in 1-day-old chicks

Although reconsolidation of memory after reminder does not seem to be the simple reiteration of the sequential stages occurring during memory consolidation, both phenomena probably employ similar mechanisms including activation of glutamate receptors and protein synthesis. It is known that group I m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurochemistry international Vol. 48; no. 6; pp. 447 - 452
Main Author Salinska, Elzbieta
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2006
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although reconsolidation of memory after reminder does not seem to be the simple reiteration of the sequential stages occurring during memory consolidation, both phenomena probably employ similar mechanisms including activation of glutamate receptors and protein synthesis. It is known that group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are involved in memory consolidation and modulation of protein synthesis. The aim of present study was to investigate the role of mGluR5 in memory consolidation and reconsolidation and to determine whether inhibition of these receptors may affect protein synthesis in these processes. The one-trial passive avoidance task on chicks was used as the experimental model of learning. Injection of the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP into a specific chick brain region IMM resulted in amnesia, provided the injection was made either shortly before or after training, or approximately 4 h after training. This amnesia was permanent, resembling the effects of protein synthesis inhibitors. MPEP injection immediately after reminder resulted in only a transient amnesia revealed 1 h later. Increased expression of Zif/268 and c-Fos proteins 2 h after initial training was abolished bilaterally in chicks injected with MPEP. Injection of MPEP immediately after reminder did not inhibit c-Fos and Zif/268 expression, on the contrary, their expression was increased, specifically in left IMM and was similar to that observed after initial training. These results show that at least in the chick model mGluR5 play an important role in both consolidation and reconsolidation of memory but the mechanisms triggered by their activation in these processes differ. It is suggested that Ca 2+ signal derived from mGluR5 stimulation is necessary for complete memory consolidation, whereas during reconsolidation other mGluR5 triggered mechanisms of protein synthesis activation and regulation may be involved.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0197-0186
1872-9754
DOI:10.1016/j.neuint.2005.11.015