Reproductive Oppression Enters the Twenty-First Century: Pressure to Use Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) in the Context of “LARC First”

The common emphasis on the superior pregnancy protection of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) may result in medical providers’ pressuring women, especially those belonging to groups experiencing reproductive disciplining, to use LARC. The authors consider reports of having felt pressured t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocius : sociological research for a dynamic world Vol. 9
Main Authors Eeckhaut, Mieke C. W., Hara, Yuko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.06.2023
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The common emphasis on the superior pregnancy protection of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) may result in medical providers’ pressuring women, especially those belonging to groups experiencing reproductive disciplining, to use LARC. The authors consider reports of having felt pressured to get or keep LARC in the 2021 Delaware and Maryland Survey of Women (1,058 current users and 1,788 ever users of LARC) and examine variation in these outcomes by women’s sociodemographic characteristics. The results reveal a high prevalence of both pressure to get (26 percent of current users) and keep (11 percent of ever users) LARC overall and among young (<25 years) mothers in particular. In addition, pressure to keep LARC is more common among economically disadvantaged, unmarried, and Hispanic women. These findings reveal that in the context of “LARC first” and enduring stratified reproduction, LARC pressure is common, particularly among groups that have long been targets of reproductive disciplining.
ISSN:2378-0231
2378-0231
DOI:10.1177/23780231231180378