Improvement of hydrogen production by biological route using repeated batch cycles
•Hydrogen produced by dark fermentation based on repeated-batch cycles.•Extension superior to 900h was succeeded with alternated cycles of sugars.•Maximum H2 yield (3.4mol H2/mol hexose) resulted from alternated addition of sugars.•Maximum hydrogen productivity was 168.27mmol H2/L/day in 24h of proc...
Saved in:
Published in | Process biochemistry (1991) Vol. 58; pp. 60 - 68 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Barking
Elsevier Ltd
01.07.2017
Elsevier BV |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •Hydrogen produced by dark fermentation based on repeated-batch cycles.•Extension superior to 900h was succeeded with alternated cycles of sugars.•Maximum H2 yield (3.4mol H2/mol hexose) resulted from alternated addition of sugars.•Maximum hydrogen productivity was 168.27mmol H2/L/day in 24h of process.•Microorganisms followed the butyric-type fermentation.
Hydrogen is considered a very clean energy source, since its combustion releases mainly water as a reaction product. Besides, it has the advantage of having the highest energy density when compared to any other fuel. This work studied the hydrogen production applying dark fermentation by a heat shock pre-treated microbial consortium. A repeated batch cycle operation was evaluated by adding glucose or lactose in an isolated, alternated or simultaneous ways, in order to keep the production of hydrogen for a longer time. Fermentations with simultaneous addition of glucose and lactose promoted maximum productivity of 168.27mmol H2L−1day−1. Nevertheless, the alternation of two carbon source (glucose and lactose) allowed keeping the culture active with potential to hydrogen production for a period of time higher than 900h. At the end of fermentation, the main products were lactic acid and butyric acid, followed by acetic acid, ethanol and propionic acid. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1359-5113 1873-3298 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.procbio.2017.04.013 |