Motor learning without movement

Prediction errors guide many forms of learning, providing teaching signals that help us improve our performance. Implicit motor adaptation, for instance, is thought to be driven by sensory prediction errors (SPEs), which occur when the expected and observed consequences of a movement differ. Traditi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 119; no. 30; p. e2204379119
Main Authors Kim, Olivia A, Forrence, Alexander D, McDougle, Samuel D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 26.07.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Prediction errors guide many forms of learning, providing teaching signals that help us improve our performance. Implicit motor adaptation, for instance, is thought to be driven by sensory prediction errors (SPEs), which occur when the expected and observed consequences of a movement differ. Traditionally, SPE computation is thought to require movement execution. However, recent work suggesting that the brain can generate sensory predictions based on motor imagery or planning alone calls this assumption into question. Here, by measuring implicit motor adaptation during a visuomotor task, we tested whether motor planning and well-timed sensory feedback are sufficient for adaptation. Human participants were cued to reach to a target and were, on a subset of trials, rapidly cued to withhold these movements. Errors displayed both on trials with and without movements induced single-trial adaptation. Learning following trials without movements persisted even when movement trials had never been paired with errors and when the direction of movement and sensory feedback trajectories were decoupled. These observations indicate that the brain can compute errors that drive implicit adaptation without generating overt movements, leading to the adaptation of motor commands that are not overtly produced.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by Peter Strick, Brain Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; received March 11, 2022; accepted June 9, 2022
Author contributions: O.A.K., A.D.F., and S.D.M. designed research; O.A.K. and A.D.F. performed research; O.A.K. and A.D.F. analyzed data; and O.A.K., A.D.F., and S.D.M. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2204379119