Radical hysterectomy: Current management guidelines

Over the past 11 years (January 1985 through December 1996) the senior authors (B.F.H. and H.B.K.) have performed 205 radical hysterectomies. The most notable trend observed was a marked decrease in length of stay from 12.8 days to 3.5 days. Contributing factors include use of the Maylard incision,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology Vol. 177; no. 2; pp. 372 - 374
Main Authors Helmkamp, B.Frederick, Krebs, Hans-B., Corbett, Susan L., Trodden, Regina M., Black, Pamela W.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia, PA Mosby, Inc 01.08.1997
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Over the past 11 years (January 1985 through December 1996) the senior authors (B.F.H. and H.B.K.) have performed 205 radical hysterectomies. The most notable trend observed was a marked decrease in length of stay from 12.8 days to 3.5 days. Contributing factors include use of the Maylard incision, placement of suprapubic Foley catheters, discontinuation of drains, early oral feeding, admission to the hospital on the day of surgery, and initiation of a critical care pathway. All criteria for short-stay radical hysterectomy were established by 1994. With continued modification of surgical technique and use of the critical care pathway, short stay has become our standard of care for radical hysterectomy. Complications are minimal, with neither long-term morbidity nor mortality associated with the short stay. In addition, significant cost savings occur, which benefits the patient, hospital, and the health care system. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:372-4.)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70200-X