Radical hysterectomy: Current management guidelines
Over the past 11 years (January 1985 through December 1996) the senior authors (B.F.H. and H.B.K.) have performed 205 radical hysterectomies. The most notable trend observed was a marked decrease in length of stay from 12.8 days to 3.5 days. Contributing factors include use of the Maylard incision,...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology Vol. 177; no. 2; pp. 372 - 374 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
Philadelphia, PA
Mosby, Inc
01.08.1997
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Over the past 11 years (January 1985 through December 1996) the senior authors (B.F.H. and H.B.K.) have performed 205 radical hysterectomies. The most notable trend observed was a marked decrease in length of stay from 12.8 days to 3.5 days. Contributing factors include use of the Maylard incision, placement of suprapubic Foley catheters, discontinuation of drains, early oral feeding, admission to the hospital on the day of surgery, and initiation of a critical care pathway. All criteria for short-stay radical hysterectomy were established by 1994. With continued modification of surgical technique and use of the critical care pathway, short stay has become our standard of care for radical hysterectomy. Complications are minimal, with neither long-term morbidity nor mortality associated with the short stay. In addition, significant cost savings occur, which benefits the patient, hospital, and the health care system. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:372-4.) |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70200-X |