Population Study of Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction for Targeted Screening and Prevention

Unselected population-based personalised ovarian cancer (OC) risk assessment combining genetic/epidemiology/hormonal data has not previously been undertaken. We aimed to perform a feasibility study of OC risk stratification of general population women using a personalised OC risk tool followed by ri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancers Vol. 12; no. 5; p. 1241
Main Authors Gaba, Faiza, Blyuss, Oleg, Liu, Xinting, Goyal, Shivam, Lahoti, Nishant, Chandrasekaran, Dhivya, Kurzer, Margarida, Kalsi, Jatinderpal, Sanderson, Saskia, Lanceley, Anne, Ahmed, Munaza, Side, Lucy, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Wallis, Yvonne, Wallace, Andrew, Waller, Jo, Luccarini, Craig, Yang, Xin, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison, Lee, Andrew, Antoniou, Antonis C, Legood, Rosa, Menon, Usha, Jacobs, Ian, Manchanda, Ranjit
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 15.05.2020
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Unselected population-based personalised ovarian cancer (OC) risk assessment combining genetic/epidemiology/hormonal data has not previously been undertaken. We aimed to perform a feasibility study of OC risk stratification of general population women using a personalised OC risk tool followed by risk management. Volunteers were recruited through London primary care networks. women ≥18 years. prior ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer, previous genetic testing for OC genes. Participants accessed an online/web-based decision aid along with optional telephone helpline use. Consenting individuals completed risk assessment and underwent genetic testing ( , OC susceptibility single-nucleotide polymorphisms). A validated OC risk prediction algorithm provided a personalised OC risk estimate using genetic/lifestyle/hormonal OC risk factors. Population genetic testing (PGT)/OC risk stratification uptake/acceptability, satisfaction, decision aid/telephone helpline use, psychological health and quality of life were assessed using validated/customised questionnaires over six months. Linear-mixed models/contrast tests analysed impact on study outcomes. feasibility/acceptability, uptake, decision aid/telephone helpline use, satisfaction/regret, and impact on psychological health/quality of life. In total, 123 volunteers (mean age = 48.5 (SD = 15.4) years) used the decision aid, 105 (85%) consented. None fulfilled NHS genetic testing clinical criteria. OC risk stratification revealed 1/103 at ≥10% (high), 0/103 at ≥5%-<10% (intermediate), and 100/103 at <5% (low) lifetime OC risk. Decision aid satisfaction was 92.2%. The telephone helpline use rate was 13% and the questionnaire response rate at six months was 75%. Contrast tests indicated that overall depression ( = 0.30), anxiety ( = 0.10), quality-of-life ( = 0.99), and distress ( = 0.25) levels did not jointly change, while OC worry ( = 0.021) and general cancer risk perception ( = 0.015) decreased over six months. In total, 85.5-98.7% were satisfied with their decision. Findings suggest population-based personalised OC risk stratification is feasible and acceptable, has high satisfaction, reduces cancer worry/risk perception, and does not negatively impact psychological health/quality of life.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2072-6694
2072-6694
DOI:10.3390/cancers12051241