Machine Learning Using Real-World and Translational Data to Improve Treatment Selection for NSCLC Patients Treated with Immunotherapy

• Published in: Cancers Vol. 14; no. 2; p. 435
• Main Authors: Prelaj, Arsela, Boeri, Mattia, Robuschi, Alessandro, Ferrara, Roberto, Proto, Claudia, Lo Russo, Giuseppe, Galli, Giulia, De Toma, Alessandro, Brambilla, Marta, Occhipinti, Mario, Manglaviti, Sara, Beninato, Teresa, Bottiglieri, Achille, Massa, Giacomo, Zattarin, Emma, Gallucci, Rosaria, Galli, Edoardo Gregorio, Ganzinelli, Monica, Sozzi, Gabriella, de Braud, Filippo G M, Garassino, Marina Chiara, Restelli, Marcello, Pedrocchi, Alessandra Laura Giulia, Trovo', Francesco
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 16.01.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Algorithms; Apoptosis; Artificial intelligence; Biomarkers; Blood; Clinical medicine; Data collection; Immunotherapy; Learning algorithms; Lung cancer; Machine learning; Medical prognosis; Medical screening; Metastasis; MicroRNAs; miRNA; Non-small cell lung carcinoma; Patients; PD-L1 protein; Plasma; Small cell lung carcinoma; Survival analysis; Thorax; Italy; non-small cell lung cancer; biomarker; machine learning; artificial intelligence; immunotherapy
• ISSN: 2072-6694; 2072-6694
• DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020435

(1) Background: In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) remains the only biomarker for candidate patients to immunotherapy (IO). This study aimed at using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) tools to improve response and efficacy predictions in aNSCLC patients treated with IO. (2) Methods: Real world data and the blood microRNA signature classifier (MSC) were used. Patients were divided into responders (R) and non-responders (NR) to determine if the overall survival of the patients was likely to be shorter or longer than 24 months from baseline IO. (3) Results: One-hundred sixty-four out of 200 patients (i.e., only those ones with PD-L1 data available) were considered in the model, 73 (44.5%) were R and 91 (55.5%) NR. Overall, the best model was the linear regression (RL) and included 5 features. The model predicting R/NR of patients achieved accuracy ACC = 0.756, F1 score F1 = 0.722, and area under the ROC curve AUC = 0.82. LR was also the best-performing model in predicting patients with long survival (24 months OS), achieving ACC = 0.839, F1 = 0.908, and AUC = 0.87. (4) Conclusions: The results suggest that the integration of multifactorial data provided by ML techniques is a useful tool to select NSCLC patients as candidates for IO.