Prediction of Breast Cancer Histological Outcome by Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography

• Published in: Cancers Vol. 14; no. 9; p. 2132
• Main Authors: Petrillo, Antonella, Fusco, Roberta, Di Bernardo, Elio, Petrosino, Teresa, Barretta, Maria Luisa, Porto, Annamaria, Granata, Vincenza, Di Bonito, Maurizio, Fanizzi, Annarita, Massafra, Raffaella, Petruzzellis, Nicole, Arezzo, Francesca, Boldrini, Luca, La Forgia, Daniele
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 25.04.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Algorithms; Artificial intelligence; Automation; Benign; Breast cancer; Cancer therapies; Classification; Decision making; Energy; Epidermal growth factor; Estrogens; Lesions; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography; Multivariate analysis; Patients; Radiomics; Statistical analysis; Tumors; United States > US; Italy; Dynamic Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI); radiomics; Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM); artificial intelligence
• ISSN: 2072-6694; 2072-6694
• DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092132

To evaluate radiomics features in order to: differentiate malignant versus benign lesions; predict low versus moderate and high grading; identify positive or negative hormone receptors; and discriminate positive versus negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 related to breast cancer. A total of 182 patients with known breast lesions and that underwent Contrast-Enhanced Mammography were enrolled in this retrospective study. The reference standard was pathology (118 malignant lesions and 64 benign lesions). A total of 837 textural metrics were extracted by manually segmenting the region of interest from both craniocaudally (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views. Non-parametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, receiver operating characteristic, logistic regression and tree-based machine learning algorithms were used. The Adaptive Synthetic Sampling balancing approach was used and a feature selection process was implemented. In univariate analysis, the classification of malignant versus benign lesions achieved the best performance when considering the original_gldm_DependenceNonUniformity feature extracted on CC view (accuracy of 88.98%). An accuracy of 83.65% was reached in the classification of grading, whereas a slightly lower value of accuracy (81.65%) was found in the classification of the presence of the hormone receptor; the features extracted were the original_glrlm_RunEntropy and the original_gldm_DependenceNonUniformity, respectively. The results of multivariate analysis achieved the best performances when using two or more features as predictors for classifying malignant versus benign lesions from CC view images (max test accuracy of 95.83% with a non-regularized logistic regression). Considering the features extracted from MLO view images, the best test accuracy (91.67%) was obtained when predicting the grading using a classification-tree algorithm. Combinations of only two features, extracted from both CC and MLO views, always showed test accuracy values greater than or equal to 90.00%, with the only exception being the prediction of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, where the best performance (test accuracy of 89.29%) was obtained with the random forest algorithm. The results confirm that the identification of malignant breast lesions and the differentiation of histological outcomes and some molecular subtypes of tumors (mainly positive hormone receptor tumors) can be obtained with satisfactory accuracy through both univariate and multivariate analysis of textural features extracted from Contrast-Enhanced Mammography images.