The effect of intruded events on peak time: The role of reinforcement history during the intruded event
Pigeons were studied in an extension of a study by Aum et al. [Aum, S., Brown, B.L., Hemmes, N.S. 2004. The effects of concurrent task and gap events on peak time in the peak procedure. Behav. Process. 65, 43–56] on timing behavior under a discrete-trial fixed-interval (FI) procedure during which 6-...
Saved in:
Published in | Behavioural processes Vol. 74; no. 2; pp. 187 - 197 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
Shannon
Elsevier B.V
22.02.2007
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Pigeons were studied in an extension of a study by Aum et al. [Aum, S., Brown, B.L., Hemmes, N.S. 2004. The effects of concurrent task and gap events on peak time in the peak procedure. Behav. Process. 65, 43–56] on timing behavior under a discrete-trial fixed-interval (FI) procedure during which 6-s intruded events were superimposed on peak-interval (PI) test trials. In Aum et al., one event consisted in termination of the timing cue (gap trial); the other was a stimulus in the presence of which subjects had been trained to respond under an independent random-interval (RI) schedule of reinforcement (concurrent task trial). Aum et al. found a disruption of timing on concurrent task trials that was greater than that on gap trials. The present study investigated history of reinforcement associated with intruded events as a possible explanation of this earlier finding. After training to peck a side key on a 30-s PI procedure, discrimination training was conducted on the center key in separate sessions; red or green 6-s stimuli were associated with RI 24
s or EXT (extinction) schedules. During testing under the PI procedure, three types of intruded events were presented during probe trials—the stimulus associated with the RI (S+) or EXT (S−) schedule during discrimination training, or a gap (termination of the side-keylight). Intruded events occurred 3, 9, or 15
s after PI trial onset. Effects of reinforcement history were revealed as substantial disruption of timing during the S+ event and relatively little disruption during the S− event. Intermediate effects were found for the gap event. Results indicate that postcue effects are at least partially responsible for the disruptive effects of the S+ event. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0376-6357 1872-8308 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.11.001 |