Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers

• Published in: Gut and liver Vol. 17; no. 6; pp. 874 - 883
• Main Authors: Lu, Yi, Wu, Jiachuan, Hu, Minhui, Zhong, Qinghua, Er, Limian, Shi, Huihui, Cheng, Weihui, Chen, Ke, Liu, Yuan, Qiu, Bingfeng, Xu, Qiancheng, Lai, Guangshun, Wang, Yufeng, Luo, Yuxuan, Mu, Jinbao, Zhang, Wenjie, Zhi, Min, Sun, Jiachen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver 01.11.2023; 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
• Subjects: artificial intelligence; endoscopic ultrasonography; gastric; gastrointestinal stromal tumors; subepithelial lesions; 내과학; Gastrointestinal stromal tumors; Gastric; Subepithelial lesions; Artificial intelligence; Endoscopic ultrasonography
• ISSN: 1976-2283; 2005-1212; 2005-1212
• DOI: 10.5009/gnl220347

The accuracy of endosonographers in diagnosing gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is influenced by experience and subjectivity. Artificial intelligence (AI) has achieved remarkable development in this field. This study aimed to develop an AI-based EUS diagnostic model for the diagnosis of SELs, and evaluated its efficacy with external validation. We developed the EUS-AI model with ResNeSt50 using EUS images from two hospitals to predict the histopathology of the gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria. The diagnostic performance of the model was also validated using EUS images obtained from four other hospitals. A total of 2,057 images from 367 patients (375 SELs) were chosen to build the models, and 914 images from 106 patients (108 SELs) were chosen for external validation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the model for differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and non-GISTs in the external validation sets by images were 82.01%, 68.22%, 86.77%, 59.86%, and 78.12%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in the external validation set by tumors were 83.75%, 71.43%, 89.33%, 60.61%, and 80.56%, respectively. The EUS-AI model showed better performance (especially specificity) than some endosonographers. The model helped improve the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of certain endosonographers. We developed an EUS-AI model to classify gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria into GISTs and non-GISTs with good accuracy. The model may help improve the diagnostic performance of endosonographers. Further work is required to develop a multi-modal EUS-AI system.