A comparison of acipimox and nicotinic acid in type 2b hyperlipidaemia

The side effect profiles and lipid lowering efficacy of nicotinic acid (1 g three times daily) and its analogue acipimox (250 mg three times daily) in type 2b hyperlipidaemia were compared in a double‐blind placebo controlled study. In the nicotinic acid group (n = 7) at 12 weeks there were signific...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of clinical pharmacology Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 451 - 453
Main Authors O'Kane, MJ, Trinick, TR, Tynan, MB, Trimble, ER, Nicholls, DP
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.1992
Blackwell Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The side effect profiles and lipid lowering efficacy of nicotinic acid (1 g three times daily) and its analogue acipimox (250 mg three times daily) in type 2b hyperlipidaemia were compared in a double‐blind placebo controlled study. In the nicotinic acid group (n = 7) at 12 weeks there were significant reductions (P less than 0.05) with respect to placebo (n = 9) in total cholesterol (median and range) 6.6 mmol l‐1 (4.8‐8.4) vs 8.8 mmol l‐1 (7.5‐9.5), triglyceride 1.4 mmol l‐1 (0.5‐ 4.6) vs 2.8 mmol l‐1 (1.5‐9.5) and apoprotein B 88.6 mg dl‐1 (62.1‐114) vs 121.9 mg dl‐1 (88.0‐170.7). In contrast there was no significant alteration in lipids in the acipimox group (n = 12). Nicotinic acid was associated with a high incidence of side effects, principally cutaneous flushing, while acipimox was well tolerated by all patients.
ISSN:0306-5251
1365-2125
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.1992.tb04067.x