Infection risk dictates immunological divergence among populations in a Mediterranean lizard

• Published in: Journal of evolutionary biology Vol. 29; no. 9; pp. 1680 - 1688
• Main Authors: Sagonas, K., Rota, I. A., Tsitsilonis, O. E., Pafilis, P., Valakos, E. D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2016
• Subjects: Animals; cell‐mediated response; Environment; Evolutionary biology; Greece; immune resistance; immune tolerance; Immunity; Immunology; Infections; island; Lacertilia; Lizards - immunology; Lizards - parasitology; mixed lymphocyte reaction; Parasites; Podarcis; Protozoa; reptiles; Reptiles & amphibians; mixed lymphocyte reaction; immune tolerance; cell-mediated response; island; reptiles; immune resistance
• ISSN: 1010-061X; 1420-9101
• DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12903

The ability of vertebrates to evolve different defence strategies in response to varying parasitism regimes remains poorly understood. Hosts may adopt two different strategies to defend themselves against parasites: tolerance (hosts alleviate the negative fitness consequences of parasite infection) and resistance (hosts strengthen their immune response as parasite burden increases). Both strategies are effective, but fitness has been reported to decline faster in less‐tolerant individuals. Here, we assessed the number of splenocytes and the cell‐mediated response (proxies for resistance) and body condition (a proxy for tolerance) in four populations of a Greek endemic lizard (Podarcis gaigeae), each exposed to different infection risks (defined as the cumulative effect of parasite burden and duration of exposure). We anticipated that populations with heavy parasite burden would enhance the efficacy of their immune response (resistance) compared to lizards deriving from parasite‐poor habitats. We also predicted that populations with longer exposure to parasites would be adopted and be more tolerant. Each factor (duration of exposure and parasite burden) had a distinct effect on the immune response, and thus, our results were rather complicated. Lizards with heavy parasite burden and aperiodic exposure demonstrated resistance, whereas lizards with heavy parasite burden and chronic exposure were more tolerant. Populations with low parasite burden and minimal exposure were more resistant. Our results suggest that the development of some immunological strategies may be differentiated under different infection risks, even within the same species.