Measurement of fetal fat in utero in normal and diabetic pregnancies using magnetic resonance imaging

• Published in: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 335 - 340
• Main Authors: Anblagan, D., Deshpande, R., Jones, N. W., Costigan, C., Bugg, G., Raine‐Fenning, N., Gowland, P. A., Mansell, P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.09.2013; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Adipose Tissue - physiology; Adult; body composition; Body Composition - physiology; Case-Control Studies; diabetes; fat; Female; Fetal Weight - physiology; fetus; Fetus - physiology; Humans; magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Pregnancy; Pregnancy in Diabetics; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Reproducibility of Results; fat; body composition; magnetic resonance imaging; diabetes; fetus; pregnancy
• ISSN: 0960-7692; 1469-0705
• DOI: 10.1002/uog.12382

ABSTRACT Objectives To assess the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure fetal fat volume in utero, and to study fetal growth in women with and without diabetes in view of the increased prevalence of macrosomia in the former. Methods We studied 26 pregnant women, 14 with pre‐gestational diabetes and 12 non‐diabetic controls. Fetal assessment took place at 24 weeks' gestation and again at 34 weeks by standard ultrasound biometry followed by MRI at 1.5 T. Fetal fat volume was determined from T1‐weighted water‐suppressed images using a semi‐automated approach based on pixel intensity and taking into account partial volume effects. Fetal volume was also determined from the MRI images. Fetal weight was calculated using published fat and lean tissue densities. Results There was little fetal fat at 24 weeks' gestation, but at 34 weeks the fetal fat content was considerably higher in the women with diabetes, with a mean fat content of 1090 ± 417 cm3 compared with 541 ± 348 cm3 in the controls (P = 0.006). Measurements of fetal fat volume showed low intra‐ and interobserver variability at 34 weeks, with intraclass correlation coefficients consistently above 0.99. Birth‐weight centile correlated with fetal fat volume (R2 = 0.496, P < 0.001), percentage of fetal fat (R2 = 0.362, P = 0.008) and calculated fetal weight (R2 = 0.492, P < 0.001) at 34 weeks. Conclusions MRI appears to be a promising tool for the determination of fetal fat, body composition and weight in utero during the third trimester of pregnancy. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.