Hearing conservation in the primary aluminium industry

• Published in: Occupational medicine (Oxford) Vol. 66; no. 3; pp. 208 - 214
• Main Authors: Donoghue, A M, Frisch, N, Dixon-Ernst, C, Chesson, B J, Cullen, M R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Oxford University Press 01.04.2016
• Subjects: Aluminum; Audiometry; Australia; Ear Protective Devices - utilization; Environmental Monitoring - methods; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - etiology; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - physiopathology; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - prevention & control; Humans; Incidence; Metallurgy; Noise, Occupational - adverse effects; Noise, Occupational - prevention & control; Occupational Diseases - etiology; Occupational Diseases - physiopathology; Occupational Diseases - prevention & control; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects; Occupational Exposure - prevention & control; Original Paper; Australia; Audiometry; minerals processing; noise; noise-induced hearing loss; hearing loss; mining; smelter
• ISSN: 0962-7480; 1471-8405
• DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqv168

Noise-induced hearing loss has been an intractable problem for heavy industry. To report our experience in reducing the incidence of age-corrected confirmed 10 dB hearing shifts (averaged over 2, 3 and 4 kHz) in employees in the primary aluminium industry in Australia over the period 2006-13. We analysed annual audiometric data to determine the number of permanent hearing shifts that occurred in employees in two bauxite mines, three alumina refineries and two aluminium smelters. Annual hearing shift rates were calculated based on the number of employees tested per year. Hearing conservation initiatives undertaken during the study period are described. An assessment of similar exposure group noise exposures was also undertaken to determine the magnitude of noise exposure reduction during the study period. Across all operations, hearing shift rates declined from 5.5% per year in 2006 to 1.3% per year in 2013 (P < 0.001). The decline in shift rates was greater in mines and refineries, where baseline shift rates were higher, than in smelter workers. Modest reductions in noise exposure occurred during the study period. We observed a substantial decline in hearing shift rates during the study period. We describe the hearing conservation initiatives that were collectively associated with this decline. We suspect these initiatives could be deployed relatively easily and at modest cost in other industries with noise-exposed employees.