Human brain potentials to reading syntactic errors in sentences of different complexity

In order to determine if an event-related brain potential (ERP) effect described for syntactic violations (P600/SPS) varies with the amount of reprocessing entailed by a violation, number incongruencies were presented either within simple declarative or within subordinate clauses. ERPs were recorded...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroscience letters Vol. 235; no. 3; pp. 105 - 108
Main Authors Münte, Thomas F., Szentkuti, Andras, Wieringa, Bernardina M., Matzke, Mike, Johannes, Sönke
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Shannon Elsevier Ireland Ltd 17.10.1997
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In order to determine if an event-related brain potential (ERP) effect described for syntactic violations (P600/SPS) varies with the amount of reprocessing entailed by a violation, number incongruencies were presented either within simple declarative or within subordinate clauses. ERPs were recorded while 12 German subjects read the stimulus materials presented word by word on a video monitor. The ERPs showed a P600/SPS effect for all sentence types, which was smallest in amplitude and earliest in latency for simple declarative sentences. This effect therefore qualifies as a metric for the amount and timing of syntactic reprocessing entailed by a syntactic error. In addition, a late frontal negativity (1000–1400 ms range) was found for the simple declarative sentences.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-News-3
ISSN:0304-3940
1872-7972
DOI:10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00719-2