Human brain potentials to reading syntactic errors in sentences of different complexity
In order to determine if an event-related brain potential (ERP) effect described for syntactic violations (P600/SPS) varies with the amount of reprocessing entailed by a violation, number incongruencies were presented either within simple declarative or within subordinate clauses. ERPs were recorded...
Saved in:
Published in | Neuroscience letters Vol. 235; no. 3; pp. 105 - 108 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Shannon
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
17.10.1997
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In order to determine if an event-related brain potential (ERP) effect described for syntactic violations (P600/SPS) varies with the amount of reprocessing entailed by a violation, number incongruencies were presented either within simple declarative or within subordinate clauses. ERPs were recorded while 12 German subjects read the stimulus materials presented word by word on a video monitor. The ERPs showed a P600/SPS effect for all sentence types, which was smallest in amplitude and earliest in latency for simple declarative sentences. This effect therefore qualifies as a metric for the amount and timing of syntactic reprocessing entailed by a syntactic error. In addition, a late frontal negativity (1000–1400 ms range) was found for the simple declarative sentences. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-News-3 |
ISSN: | 0304-3940 1872-7972 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00719-2 |