Evaluation of sorption/solubility, softening, flexural strength and elastic modulus of experimental resin blends with chlorhexidine

• Published in: Journal of dentistry Vol. 49; pp. 40 - 45
• Main Authors: Inagaki, Luciana Tiemi, Dainezi, Vanessa Benetello, Alonso, Roberta Caroline Bruschi, Paula, Andréia Bolzan de, Garcia-Godoy, Franklin, Puppin-Rontani, Regina Maria, Pascon, Fernanda Miori
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Persian
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2016; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Analysis of variance; Biofilms; Bisphenol A; Blends; Bond strength; Chlorhexidine; Composite Resins; Dentistry; Elastic Modulus; Enamel; Ethanol; Flexural strength; Hypotheses; Infiltrants; Materials Testing; Mechanical properties; Modulus of rupture in bending; Molecular weight; Polymer blends; Polymerization; Softening; Solubility; Sorption; Studies; TEGDMA; Germany; Sorption; Elastic modulus; Infiltrants; Solubility; Flexural strength; Chlorhexidine; Softening
• ISSN: 0300-5712; 1879-176X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.04.006

To evaluate physical-chemical properties of experimental diacetate chlorhexidine (CHX)-added resin blends. Blends were formulated: G1)TEGDMA; G2)TEGDMA/0.1%CHX; G3)TEGDMA/0.2%CHX; G4)TEGDMA/UDMA; G5)TEGDMA/UDMA/0.1%CHX; G6)TEGDMA/UDMA/0.2%CHX; G7)TEGDMA/BisEMA, G8)TEGDMA/BisEMA/0.1%CHX; G9)TEGDMA/BisEMA/0.2%CHX. Icon® was the control group. For sorption/solubility (SS), cylindrical specimens (n=5) were prepared and their weight obtained. The specimens were immersed in deionized water for 7days at 37°C and their weight was verified again. SS were calculated using accepted formulas. For softening, cylindrical specimens (n=10) were prepared and initial Knoop hardness number (KHN) obtained. The specimens were immersed in absolute ethanol for 24h at 37°C and final KHN accomplished. Softening values were calculated by KHN reduction percentage. For elastic modulus (EM) and flexural strength (FS) bar specimens were prepared (n=10) and values obtained with a universal device (three point, 5mm distance, 0.5mm/min, load of 50N). The data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α=5%). TEGDMA/BisEMA blends and Icon® showed the lowest sorption from blends (p>0.05), and Icon® was the most soluble material (p<0.01). TEGDMA/UDMA/0.1%CHX showed the highest softening, similar to Icon® (p>0.05). For EM, all blends were different than Icon® (p<0.01). For FS, TEGDMA blends were similar to Icon®, showing the lowest averages (p>0.05). Monomers chemical characteristics influenced the physical-chemical properties of experimental blends more than CHX. Between the blends tested, UDMA blends presented satisfactory results for assays evaluated. Infiltrants CHX-added could arrest and reinforce initial caries lesions, and the antimicrobial effect could prevent new lesions in sound enamel adjacent to the infiltrated area.