Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity

• Published in: Brain (London, England : 1878) Vol. 146; no. 3; pp. 1006 - 1020
• Main Authors: Hensel, Lukas, Lange, Fabian, Tscherpel, Caroline, Viswanathan, Shivakumar, Freytag, Jana, Volz, Lukas J, Eickhoff, Simon B, Fink, Gereon R, Grefkes, Christian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: US Oxford University Press 01.03.2023
• Subjects: Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Motor Cortex - diagnostic imaging; Original; Parietal Lobe; Recovery of Function; Stroke - diagnostic imaging; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; intraparietal sulcus; kinematics; resting-state fMRI; rTMS; motor recovery
• ISSN: 0006-8950; 1460-2156; 1460-2156
• DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac157

Abstract Activity changes in the ipsi- and contralesional parietal cortex and abnormal interhemispheric connectivity between these regions are commonly observed after stroke, however, their significance for motor recovery remains poorly understood. We here assessed the contribution of ipsilesional and contralesional anterior intraparietal cortex (aIPS) for hand motor function in 18 recovered chronic stroke patients and 18 healthy control subjects using a multimodal assessment consisting of resting-state functional MRI, motor task functional MRI, online-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) interference, and 3D movement kinematics. Effects were compared against two control stimulation sites, i.e. contralesional M1 and a sham stimulation condition. We found that patients with good motor outcome compared to patients with more substantial residual deficits featured increased resting-state connectivity between ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional aIPS as well as between ipsilesional aIPS and dorsal premotor cortex. Moreover, interhemispheric connectivity between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional M1 as well as ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional M1 correlated with better motor performance across tasks. TMS interference at individual aIPS and M1 coordinates led to differential effects depending on the motor task that was tested, i.e. index finger-tapping, rapid pointing movements, or a reach-grasp-lift task. Interfering with contralesional aIPS deteriorated the accuracy of grasping, especially in patients featuring higher connectivity between ipsi- and contralesional aIPS. In contrast, interference with the contralesional M1 led to impaired grasping speed in patients featuring higher connectivity between bilateral M1. These findings suggest differential roles of contralesional M1 and aIPS for distinct aspects of recovered hand motor function, depending on the reorganization of interhemispheric connectivity. Hensel et al. combine fMRI, rTMS and 3D hand movement analyses to test the contributions of contralesional motor cortex (M1) and anterior parietal sulcus (aIPS) to motor recovery post-stroke. The results reveal differential roles of M1 and aIPS in different aspects of recovered hand motor function, depending on interhemispheric connectivity. See Ward (https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awad001) for a scientific commentary on this article.