Selfish-herd behaviour of sheep under threat

Flocking is a striking example of collective behaviour that is found in insect swarms, fish schools and mammal herds [1]. A major factor in the evolution of flocking behaviour is thought to be predation, whereby larger and/or more cohesive groups are better at detecting predators (as, for example, i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent biology Vol. 22; no. 14; pp. R561 - R562
Main Authors King, Andrew J., Wilson, Alan M., Wilshin, Simon D., Lowe, John, Haddadi, Hamed, Hailes, Stephen, Morton, A. Jennifer
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Inc 24.07.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Flocking is a striking example of collective behaviour that is found in insect swarms, fish schools and mammal herds [1]. A major factor in the evolution of flocking behaviour is thought to be predation, whereby larger and/or more cohesive groups are better at detecting predators (as, for example, in the ‘many eyes theory’), and diluting the effects of predators (as in the ‘selfish-herd theory’) than are individuals in smaller and/or dispersed groups [2]. The former theory assumes that information (passively or actively transferred) can be disseminated more effectively in larger/cohesive groups, while the latter assumes that there are spatial benefits to individuals in a large group, since individuals can alter their spatial position relative to their group-mates and any potential predator, thus reducing their predation risk [3]. We used global positioning system (GPS) data to characterise the response of a group of ‘prey’ animals (a flock of sheep) to an approaching ‘predator’ (a herding dog). Analyses of relative sheep movement trajectories showed that sheep exhibit a strong attraction towards the centre of the flock under threat, a pattern that we could re-create using a simple model. These results support the long-standing assertion that individuals can respond to potential danger by moving towards the centre of a fleeing group [2].
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.008
SourceType-Other Sources-1
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ISSN:0960-9822
1879-0445
DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.008