Randomized double-blind study of the Reliefband as an adjunct to standard antiemetics in patients receiving moderately-high to highly emetogenic chemotherapy

• Published in: Supportive care in cancer Vol. 11; no. 8; pp. 516 - 521
• Main Authors: TREISH, Imad, SHORD, Stacy, VALGUS, John, HARVEY, Donald, NAGY, Jessica, STEGAL, Jennifer, LINDLEY, Celeste
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Heidelberg Springer 01.08.2003; Berlin Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adult; Antiemetics - therapeutic use; Biological and medical sciences; Chemotherapy; Combined Modality Therapy; Double-Blind Method; Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Nausea; Nausea - chemically induced; Nausea - prevention & control; Neoplasms - drug therapy; Pharmacology. Drug treatments; Placebos; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Toxicity: digestive system; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting; Vomiting - chemically induced; Vomiting - prevention & control; Antineoplastic agent; Human; Toxicity; Electrical stimulus; Transcutaneous electrical stimulation; Nausea; Malignant tumor; Wrist; Chemotherapy; Chinese medicine; Randomization; Treatment; Folk medicine; Acupressure; Acupuncture point; Vomiting; Acustimulation; Alternative medicine; Double blind study; Digestive diseases; Complication; Combined treatment; Antiemetic; Reliefband
• ISSN: 0941-4355; 1433-7339
• DOI: 10.1007/s00520-003-0467-3

Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the Reliefband as an adjunct to standard antiemetics in patients receiving moderately-high to highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Forty-nine adult cancer patients receiving moderately-high or highly emetogenic chemotherapy were randomized to receive either the active Reliefband ( n=26) or an inactive device ( n=23). Patients continued to receive all scheduled and as needed antiemetic agents as prescribed. The device was worn the day of chemotherapy administration for 5 days (days 1-5). Patients maintained a daily dairy of nausea severity, vomiting and retching episodes, and antiemetic medications taken. Each patient completed a Functional Living Index Emesis (FLIE) and a tolerability survey at the conclusion of the study. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the number of vomiting episodes, severity of nausea and FLIE scores between the two groups. Patients wearing the active Relifband experienced less vomiting (Reliefband 1.9 versus inactive device 4.6 mean episodes; p=0.05), retching (1.4 versus 3.6 mean episodes; p=0.05), and nausea severity (0.91 versus 1.65 mean cm/day; p=0.01) over the 5-day period compared to patients wearing the inactive device. Vomiting was statistically significantly reduced during the delayed period (0.42 versus 1; p=0.032), whereas nausea was significantly reduced during the acute (0.71 versus 2.3; p=0.028) and delayed (1.8 versus 3.3; p=0.020) periods. FLIE scores did not differ between the two treatment groups (91 versus 80; p=0.088). This study suggests that patients receiving moderately-high to highly emetogenic chemotherapy who experience nausea and vomiting despite scheduled antiemetics may benefit from the use of the Reliefband as an adjunct to antiemetics. Limitations of this study include differences in risk factors for emesis, chemotherapy, and antiemetic regimens. A larger, better, controlled randomized study is needed to better define optimal use of this device.