THE RESULTS OF A COMPARISON OF A BRAZILIAN AND AN IMPORTED KNEE PROSTHESIS - 5 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP

To compare the functional results, satisfaction rates, and revisions of total knee arthroplasties performed by the same surgical team using either Brazilian or imported implants, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years after surgery. A retrospective cohort study analyzing the medical records and intervi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa ortopedica brasileira Vol. 30; no. 1; p. e253870
Main Authors Calegari, Joao Henrique Costa, Marqueze, Thiago Cavalcante Coelho, Kadri, Omar Sharid Teixeira El, Pereira, Eike Jefferson Galdino, Queiroz, Alexandre Oliveira, Bignardi, Paulo Roberto, Danieli, Marcus Vinicius, Guerreiro, João Paulo Fernandes
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Portuguese
Published Brazil ATHA EDITORA 01.01.2022
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To compare the functional results, satisfaction rates, and revisions of total knee arthroplasties performed by the same surgical team using either Brazilian or imported implants, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years after surgery. A retrospective cohort study analyzing the medical records and interviews of patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty with Brazilian or imported implants with a minimum of 5 years after surgery. One hundred and fifty patients were evaluated (164 knees). In the functional questionnaire, 71% of patients had favorable answers in the group of patients who underwent surgery using the Brazilian prosthesis and 74.8% in the group with imported implants (p=0.634). There was no statistical difference in satisfaction between the groups, with 78.4% of patients satisfied or very satisfied in the Brazilian implant group and 90.7% in the imported implant group (p=0.053). Loosening of the implants was reported in 5.3% versus 4.7% (p>0.999). The total knee arthroplasties performed by the same surgical team with a minimum follow-up period of 5 years showed similar levels of satisfaction, function, and complications with both the Brazilian and imported implants.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION: Each author contributed individually and significantly to the development of this article. JHCC: drafted the article, sought volunteers and analyzed the data; TCCM: drafted the article, sought volunteers and analyzed the data; OSTEK: drafted the article, sought volunteers and analyzed the data, EJGP: drafted the article, sought volunteers and analyzed the data, AOQ: reviewed the article and contributed to the intellectual concept of the study; PRB: performed statistical analysis and reviewed the article; MVD: reviewed the article and contributed to the intellectual concept of the study; JPFG: drafted and reviewed the article, performed statistical analysis and contributed to the intellectual concept of the study and the entire research project.
All authors declare no potential conflict of interest related to this article.
ISSN:1413-7852
1809-4406
1809-4406
DOI:10.1590/1413-785220223001e253870