THE RESULTS OF A COMPARISON OF A BRAZILIAN AND AN IMPORTED KNEE PROSTHESIS - 5 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP
To compare the functional results, satisfaction rates, and revisions of total knee arthroplasties performed by the same surgical team using either Brazilian or imported implants, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years after surgery. A retrospective cohort study analyzing the medical records and intervi...
Saved in:
Published in | Acta ortopedica brasileira Vol. 30; no. 1; p. e253870 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English Portuguese |
Published |
Brazil
ATHA EDITORA
01.01.2022
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To compare the functional results, satisfaction rates, and revisions of total knee arthroplasties performed by the same surgical team using either Brazilian or imported implants, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years after surgery.
A retrospective cohort study analyzing the medical records and interviews of patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty with Brazilian or imported implants with a minimum of 5 years after surgery.
One hundred and fifty patients were evaluated (164 knees). In the functional questionnaire, 71% of patients had favorable answers in the group of patients who underwent surgery using the Brazilian prosthesis and 74.8% in the group with imported implants (p=0.634). There was no statistical difference in satisfaction between the groups, with 78.4% of patients satisfied or very satisfied in the Brazilian implant group and 90.7% in the imported implant group (p=0.053). Loosening of the implants was reported in 5.3% versus 4.7% (p>0.999).
The total knee arthroplasties performed by the same surgical team with a minimum follow-up period of 5 years showed similar levels of satisfaction, function, and complications with both the Brazilian and imported implants. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION: Each author contributed individually and significantly to the development of this article. JHCC: drafted the article, sought volunteers and analyzed the data; TCCM: drafted the article, sought volunteers and analyzed the data; OSTEK: drafted the article, sought volunteers and analyzed the data, EJGP: drafted the article, sought volunteers and analyzed the data, AOQ: reviewed the article and contributed to the intellectual concept of the study; PRB: performed statistical analysis and reviewed the article; MVD: reviewed the article and contributed to the intellectual concept of the study; JPFG: drafted and reviewed the article, performed statistical analysis and contributed to the intellectual concept of the study and the entire research project. All authors declare no potential conflict of interest related to this article. |
ISSN: | 1413-7852 1809-4406 1809-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1590/1413-785220223001e253870 |