Feasibility and efficacy of an activity-monitoring approach using pedometer in patients undergoing subacute rehabilitation: A pilot study

• Published in: Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Vol. 4; p. 1050638
• Main Authors: Otaka, Eri, Oguchi, Kazuyo, Yagihashi, Kei, Hoshino, Takashi, Munakata, Sachiko, Hayakawa, Atsuko, Otaka, Yohei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 22.03.2023
• Subjects: ambulatory monitoring; fitness trackers; gait dysfunction; physical activity; randomized controlled trials; Rehabilitation Sciences; wearable electronic devices; ambulatory monitoring; fitness trackers; gait dysfunction; randomized controlled trials; wearable electronic devices; physical activity
• ISSN: 2673-6861; 2673-6861
• DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1050638

Wearable devices for the quantification of walking have recently been adopted for gait rehabilitation. To apply this method in subacute rehabilitation settings, this approach must be effective in these populations and implemented as a feasible method in terms of adherence and safety, especially the risk of falling. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of an activity monitoring approach in subacute rehabilitation using a commercially available pedometer validated with slow walking. This randomized controlled study with blinded assessors recruited 29 patients admitted to a rehabilitation ward. The participants were randomly assigned to either the feedback (intervention) or the no-feedback (control) group. Participants in both groups received at least 120 min of therapy sessions every day for 6 or 7 days per week while wearing pedometers on their unaffected ankles from the day they were permitted to walk independently till discharge. Only participants in the feedback group received weekly encouragement and the next goals. The primary outcome was the change in the 6-minute walking distance (Δ6MD). Feasibility (percentage of pedometer data acquisition days in the total observational period and the number of falls) and other efficacy outcomes (step counts, gait speed, 30-seconds chair stand test, Berg Balance Scale, and Timed Up and Go Test) were also evaluated. Regarding feasibility outcomes, the data acquisition rate was 94.1% and the number of falls during the observation period was one in the feedback group. Regarding efficacy outcomes, Δ6MD was not significantly greater in the feedback group [mean (standard deviation): 79.1 (51.7) m] than in the no-feedback group [86.1 (65.4) m] ( = 0.774) and the other five secondary outcomes showed no between-group difference. Considering the large number of steps per day in both groups [6,912 (4,751) and 5,600 (5,108) steps in the feedback and no-feedback group, respectively], the effect of the intended intervention might have been masked by the effect of simply wearing pedometers in the control group. This study revealed that the activity monitoring approach using an ankle-worn pedometer was practical in terms of adherence and safety. Further clinical trials are required to elucidate ways to effectively use wearable devices in subacute rehabilitation.