Impact of a Spatial Repellent on Malaria Incidence in Two Villages in Sumba, Indonesia

• Published in: The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene Vol. 91; no. 6; pp. 1079 - 1087
• Main Authors: Syafruddin, Din, Bangs, Michael J., Sidik, Dian, Elyazar, Iqbal, Asih, Puji BS, Chan, Krisin, Nurleila, Siti, Nixon, Christian, Hendarto, Joko, Wahid, Isra, Ishak, Hasanuddin, Bøgh, Claus, Grieco, John P., Achee, Nicole L., Baird, J. Kevin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 01.12.2014
• Subjects: Anopheles; Cohort Studies; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Indonesia - epidemiology; Insect Repellents; Malaria - epidemiology; Malaria - prevention & control; Placebos; Indonesia
• ISSN: 0002-9637; 1476-1645; 1476-1645
• DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0735

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted to examine the effect of spatial repellent (SR) in households at risk of malaria in Indonesia. Following presumptive radical cure for malaria in 180 adult men representing sentinels of new infection in four clusters within two villages, all households were given either metofluthrin or placebo mosquito coils. Weekly blood smear screening and human-landing mosquito catches were done throughout the 6 months intervention. Malaria infections occurred in 61 subjects living in placebo households and 31 subjects living in SR coil households, suggesting a 52% protective effect of SR. Likewise, anopheles indoor human landing rates were 32% lower in homes receiving SR coils. Differences in the malaria attack rate between SR- and placebo-treated homes was significant when not accounting for the effects of clustering. When the analysis was adjusted for intra-cluster correlation, the differences between SR- and placebo-treated homes were not statistically significant. The findings provide evidence of SR public health benefit and support a larger trial statistically powered to detect those effects.