Comparison of Prognostic Value of Negative Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Versus Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography After Acute Myocardial Infarction

We enrolled 196 patients who had myocardial infarction and no ischemia on dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and/or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Negative studies were observed in 125 patients on DSE and in 159 on SPECT. Patients were followed for 43 ± 14 months. Cardiac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of cardiology Vol. 96; no. 1; pp. 13 - 16
Main Authors Acampa, Wanda, Spinelli, Letizia, Petretta, Mario, Salvatore, Marco, Cuocolo, Alberto
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.07.2005
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We enrolled 196 patients who had myocardial infarction and no ischemia on dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and/or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Negative studies were observed in 125 patients on DSE and in 159 on SPECT. Patients were followed for 43 ± 14 months. Cardiac events occurred in 14% of patients who did not have ischemia on DSE and in 9% of patients who did not have ischemia on SPECT. Event-free survival rate was higher in the presence of negative findings on SPECT compared with DSE (p <0.05). The lack of residual myocardial ischemia on SPECT identifies patients at low risk of events, and a negative finding on stress SPECT is superior to a negative finding on DSE.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.035