Comparison of Prognostic Value of Negative Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Versus Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography After Acute Myocardial Infarction
We enrolled 196 patients who had myocardial infarction and no ischemia on dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and/or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Negative studies were observed in 125 patients on DSE and in 159 on SPECT. Patients were followed for 43 ± 14 months. Cardiac...
Saved in:
Published in | The American journal of cardiology Vol. 96; no. 1; pp. 13 - 16 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01.07.2005
Elsevier Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We enrolled 196 patients who had myocardial infarction and no ischemia on dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and/or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Negative studies were observed in 125 patients on DSE and in 159 on SPECT. Patients were followed for 43 ± 14 months. Cardiac events occurred in 14% of patients who did not have ischemia on DSE and in 9% of patients who did not have ischemia on SPECT. Event-free survival rate was higher in the presence of negative findings on SPECT compared with DSE (p <0.05). The lack of residual myocardial ischemia on SPECT identifies patients at low risk of events, and a negative finding on stress SPECT is superior to a negative finding on DSE. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.035 |