Predicting subjective ratings of affect and comprehensibility with text features: a reader response study of narrative poetry

Literary reading is an interactive process between a reader and a text that depends on a balance between cognitive effort and emotional rewards. By studying both the crucial features of the text and of the subjective reader reception, a better understanding of this interactive process can be reached...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 15; p. 1431764
Main Authors Tilmatine, Mesian, Lüdtke, Jana, Jacobs, Arthur M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 08.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Literary reading is an interactive process between a reader and a text that depends on a balance between cognitive effort and emotional rewards. By studying both the crucial features of the text and of the subjective reader reception, a better understanding of this interactive process can be reached. In the present study, subjects ( N =31) read and rated a work of narrative fiction that was written in a poetic style, thereby offering the readers two pathways to cognitive rewards: Aesthetic appreciation and narrative immersion. Using purely text-based quantitative descriptors, we were able to independently and accurately predict the subjective ratings in the dimensions comprehensibility, valence, arousal, and liking across roughly 140 pages of naturalistic text. The specific text features that were most important in predicting each rating dimension are discussed in detail. In addition, the implications of the findings are discussed more generally in the context of existing models of literary processing and future research avenues for empirical literary studies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Rocío Díaz Zavala, National University of Saint Augustine, Peru
Pilar Ferré Romeu, University of Rovira i Virgili, Spain
Pedro García Guirao, University of Malaga, Spain
Edited by: Elena Jiménez-Pérez, University of Malaga, Spain
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1431764