A low dose of three local anesthetic solutions for interscalene blockade tested by thermal quantitative sensory testing: a randomized controlled trial

• Published in: Journal of clinical monitoring and computing Vol. 33; no. 2; pp. 307 - 316
• Main Authors: Sermeus, Luc A., Schepens, Tom, Hans, Guy H., Morrison, Stuart G., Wouters, Kristien, Breebaart, Margaretha B., Smitz, Carine J., Vercauteren, Marcel P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.04.2019; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adults; Analgesia; Analgesics; Anesthesiology; Anesthetics; Change detection; Clinical trials; Cold; Critical Care Medicine; Drug dosages; Epinephrine; Health Sciences; Infiltration; Intensive; Local anesthesia; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; NCT; NCT02691442; Original Research; Pain; Patients; Randomization; Roots; Sensory testing; Shoulder; Spinal cord; Statistics for Life Sciences; Surgery; Thresholds; Ultrasonic imaging; Thermal quantitative sensory testing; Neurosensory effects; Peripheral nerve blocks
• ISSN: 1387-1307; 1573-2614
• DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0150-3

This randomized double-blind controlled trial compared the block characteristics of three low-dose local anesthetics at different roots in an ultrasound-guided interscalene block, using thermal quantitative sensory testing for assessing the functioning of cutaneous small nerve fibres. A total of 37 adults scheduled to undergo shoulder arthroscopy were randomized to receive 5 mL of either 0.5% levobupivacaine with and without epinephrine 1/200,000 or 0.75% ropivacaine in a single-shot interscalene block. Thermal quantitative sensory testing was performed in the C4, C5, C6 and C7 dermatomes. Detection thresholds for cold/warm sensation and cold/heat pain were measured before and at 30 min, 6, 10 and 24 h after infiltration around C5. The need for rescue medication was recorded. No significant differences between groups were found for any sensation (lowest P = 0.28). At 6 h, the largest differences in sensory thresholds were observed for the C5 dermatome. The increase in thresholds were less in C4 and C6 and minimal in C7 for all sensations. The analgesic effect lasted the longest in C5 (time × location mixed model P < 0.001 for all sensory tests). The time to rescue analgesia was significantly shorter with 0.75% ropivacaine (P = 0.02). The quantitative sensory findings showed no difference in intensity between the local anesthetics tested. A decrease in block intensity, with minimal changes in pain detection thresholds, was observed in the roots adjacent to C5, with the lowest block intensity in C7. A clinically relevant shorter duration was found with 0.75% ropivacaine compared to the other groups. Trial registration NCT 02691442.