Rotatable Bi-Channel En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumor for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer in an Ex Vivo Porcine Model

• Published in: Cancers Vol. 15; no. 17; p. 4255
• Main Authors: Yao, Qiu, Jiang, Huizhong, Niu, Hui, Hu, Guangmo, Cao, Jianlong, Xue, Boxin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 25.08.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Animal models; Bladder cancer; Care and treatment; Comparative analysis; Feasibility studies; Invasiveness; Lasers; Lesions; Morphology; Surgery; Surgical outcomes; Tumors; China
• ISSN: 2072-6694; 2072-6694
• DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174255

En bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) is a promising alternative for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer management. However, the tumor characteristics and surgeon’s experience influence its application. Therefore, in this pilot study, we developed a technique called “rotatable bi-channel en bloc resection of bladder tumor (RBC-ERBT)” and assessed its feasibility, efficacy, and safety compared with those of conventional ERBT. In an ex vivo porcine bladder model, 160 bladder lesions of varying morphologies (exophytic and flat) and sizes (1 and 2 cm) were created and evenly distributed across different locations. A total of 160 procedures were performed, with the ERBT and RBC-ERBT group each exhibiting 80 lesions. RBC-ERBT had a significantly higher technical success rate than ERBT (98.8% vs. 77.5%) for exophytic and flat lesions of both sizes and dome lesions. The procedure time was significantly shorter in the RBC-ERBT group, particularly for flat lesions, lesions with a 2 cm diameter, and lesions located at the dome. RBC-ERBT had a significantly lower piecemeal resection rate than ERBT (0% vs. 18.8%). The incidence of perforation or detrusor muscle sampling did not differ between the groups. Compared with conventional ERBT, RBC-ERBT offered improved success rates, reduced resection times, and effective management of challenging lesions.