Sparing of the familiarity component of recognition memory in a patient with hippocampal pathology

Subject KN has a persistent anterograde amnesia as a result of brain injury following meningitis in 1993. MRI scans reveal a bilateral decrease in the volume of his hippocampal region (dentate gyrus, CA1–4, subicular cortices) of approximately 45% in both the right and left hemispheres, although the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuropsychologia Vol. 43; no. 12; pp. 1810 - 1823
Main Authors Aggleton, John P., Vann, Seralynne D., Denby, Christine, Dix, Sophie, Mayes, Andrew R., Roberts, Neil, Yonelinas, Andrew P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 2005
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0028-3932
1873-3514
DOI10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.019

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Subject KN has a persistent anterograde amnesia as a result of brain injury following meningitis in 1993. MRI scans reveal a bilateral decrease in the volume of his hippocampal region (dentate gyrus, CA1–4, subicular cortices) of approximately 45% in both the right and left hemispheres, although the volume of his perirhinal cortex appears normal. Aside from some changes to his occipital lobe and bilateral shrinkage of the amygdala, the rest of his brain appears normal on recent quantitative MRI scans. A striking feature of his memory loss is his ability to perform at normal levels on some tests of recognition, despite his consistent deficit on tests of recall. Two tests designed specifically to distinguish performance of two putative divisions of recognition memory (the Remember/Know procedure and the use of receiver operating characteristics to distinguish familiarity and recollection), provide evidence for a selective sparing of the familiarity component of recognition. The dissociation within recognition memory supports dual-process models of recognition, and also supports proposals that anatomically linked regions within the medial temporal lobe make qualitatively different contributions to recognition.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0028-3932
1873-3514
DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.019