Balancing of ephrin/Eph forward and reverse signaling as the driving force of adaptive topographic mapping

• Published in: Development (Cambridge) Vol. 139; no. 2; pp. 335 - 345
• Main Authors: Gebhardt, Christoph, Bastmeyer, Martin, Weth, Franco
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 15.01.2012
• Subjects: Animals; Brain Mapping - methods; Computer Simulation; Ephrins - metabolism; Growth Cones - physiology; Mice; Models, Biological; Receptors, Eph Family - metabolism; Retina - embryology; Signal Transduction - physiology; Tectum Mesencephali - embryology; Visual Pathways - embryology
• ISSN: 0950-1991; 1477-9129
• DOI: 10.1242/dev.070474

The retinotectal projection, which topographically maps retinal axons onto the tectum of the midbrain, is an ideal model system with which to investigate the molecular genetics of embryonic brain wiring. Corroborating Sperry's seminal hypothesis, ephrin/Eph counter-gradients on both retina and tectum were found to represent matching chemospecificity markers. Intriguingly, however, it has never been possible to reconstitute topographically appropriate fiber growth in vitro with these cues. Moreover, experimentally derived molecular mechanisms have failed to provide explanations as to why the mapping adapts to grossly diverse targets in some experiments, while displaying strict point-to-point specificity in others. In vitro, ephrin-A/EphA forward, as well as reverse, signaling mediate differential repulsion to retinal fibers, instead of providing topographic guidance. We argue that those responses are indicative of ephrin-A and EphA being members of a guidance system that requires two counteracting cues per axis. Experimentally, we demonstrate by introducing novel double-cue stripe assays that the simultaneous presence of both cues indeed suffices to elicit topographically appropriate guidance. The peculiar mechanism, which uses forward and reverse signaling through a single receptor/ligand combination, entails fiber/fiber interactions. We therefore propose to extend Sperry's model to include ephrin-A/EphA-based fiber/fiber chemospecificity, eventually out-competing fiber/target interactions. By computational simulation, we show that our model is consistent with stripe assay results. More importantly, however, it not only accounts for classical in vivo evidence of point-to-point and adaptive topographic mapping, but also for the map duplication found in retinal EphA knock-in mice. Nonetheless, it is based on a single constraint of topographic growth cone navigation: the balancing of ephrin-A/EphA forward and reverse signaling.