Generational diversity and team innovation: the roles of conflict and shared leadership

The increasing generational diversity in modern teams has sparked an ongoing debate about its impact on team performance. Grounded in decision-making and social identity theories, this study explores the multifaceted relationship between generational diversity and team innovation performance, examin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 15; p. 1501633
Main Authors Wang, Lingyi, Duan, Xu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 07.01.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The increasing generational diversity in modern teams has sparked an ongoing debate about its impact on team performance. Grounded in decision-making and social identity theories, this study explores the multifaceted relationship between generational diversity and team innovation performance, examining the mediating roles of cognitive and affective conflicts and the moderating role of shared leadership. The findings from a three-wave survey of five multi-generational teams in a Chinese organization reveal that generational diversity predicts both cognitive and affective conflicts, which subsequently exert opposing effects on team innovation. Shared leadership positively moderates the relationship between cognitive conflict and team innovation, amplifying the indirect positive effect of generational diversity. However, shared leadership does not moderate the relationship between affective conflict and team innovation. These results offer a more nuanced understanding of the dual role of generational diversity in team innovation and underscore the importance of shared leadership in harnessing its potential benefits.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Fahri Özsungur, Mersin University, Türkiye
Edited by: Osman Titrek, Sakarya University, Türkiye
Reviewed by: Gwendolyn Combs, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1501633