The combination therapy of oncolytic virotherapy

Compared to other cancer immunotherapies, oncolytic viruses possess several advantages, including high killing efficiency, excellent targeting capabilities, minimal adverse reactions, and multiple pathways for tumor destruction. However, the efficacy of oncolytic viruses as a monotherapy often falls...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in pharmacology Vol. 15; p. 1380313
Main Authors Wang, Yue, Zhu, Mengying, Chi, Huanyu, Liu, Yang, Yu, Guilin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 25.04.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Compared to other cancer immunotherapies, oncolytic viruses possess several advantages, including high killing efficiency, excellent targeting capabilities, minimal adverse reactions, and multiple pathways for tumor destruction. However, the efficacy of oncolytic viruses as a monotherapy often falls short of expectations. Consequently, combining oncolytic viruses with traditional treatments to achieve synergistic effects has emerged as a promising direction for the development of oncolytic virus therapies. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current progress in preclinical and clinical trials exploring the combination therapies involving oncolytic viruses. Specifically, we discuss the combination of oncolytic viruses with immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and cellular therapy. The aim of this review is to offer valuable insights and references for the further advancement of these combination strategies in clinical applications. Further research is necessary to refine the design of combination therapies and explore novel strategies to maximize the therapeutic benefits offered by oncolytic viruses.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Reviewed by: Zhifang Zhang, City of Hope National Medical Center, United States
These authors share first authorship
Edited by: Christian Celia, University of Studies G. d’Annunzio Chieti and Pescara, Italy
ISSN:1663-9812
1663-9812
DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1380313