Disparity in population structuring of Southwestern Willow Flycatchers based on geographic distance, movement patterns, and genetic analyses

ABSTRACT Estimates of population connectivity often are based on demographic analysis of movements among subpopulations, but this approach may fail to detect rare migrants or overestimate the contribution of movements into populations when migrants fail to successfully reproduce. We compared movemen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology Vol. 321; no. 10; pp. 577 - 585
Main Authors Stumpf, Katie J., Theimer, Tad C., McLeod, Mary Anne, Koronkiewicz, Thomas J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Estimates of population connectivity often are based on demographic analysis of movements among subpopulations, but this approach may fail to detect rare migrants or overestimate the contribution of movements into populations when migrants fail to successfully reproduce. We compared movement data of endangered Southwestern Willow Flycatchers among isolated populations in Nevada and Arizona from 1997 to 2008 to genetic analyses of samples collected between 2004 and 2008 to determine the degree to which these two methods were concordant in their estimates of population structuring. Given that documented movements of 13 color‐banded adults and 23 juveniles over 10 years indicated low rates of long‐distance movements, we predicted that genetic analyses would show significant population structuring between a northern (Nevada) deme and a southern (Arizona) deme. We genotyped 93 adult individuals at seven microsatellite loci and used two Bayesian clustering programs, STRUCTURE and GENELAND, to predict population structure. Both clustering algorithms produced the same structuring pattern; a cluster containing birds breeding in Pahranagat National Wildlife Refuge, the northern‐most Nevada site, and a cluster comprised of all other populations. These results highlight that estimates of subpopulation connectivity based on demographic analyses may differ from those based on genetics, suggesting either temporal changes in the pattern of movements, the importance of undetected movements, or differential contribution of migrants to the subpopulations they enter. J. Exp. Zool. 321A: 577–585, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:U.S Bureau of Reclamation
ArticleID:JEZ1886
National Science Foundation IGERT fellowship
National Science Foundation GK-12 BIOTEC Fellowship
istex:26B57B0E3CEC802E46631A8CF11183572E8A58B9
ark:/67375/WNG-9RH56ZTT-C
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1932-5223
1932-5231
DOI:10.1002/jez.1886