Plant Clinics for Improved Plant Health Systems—Malawian Plant Doctor Insights
ABSTRACT This study provides qualitative insights on the factors affecting the implementation of the plant clinic approach in Malawi from the viewpoint of plant doctors. Findings show that plant doctors perceive that the main benefit of plant clinics in Malawi has been the strengthening of local agr...
Saved in:
Published in | Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J. : 2018) Vol. 6; no. 3; pp. e70056 - n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.06.2025
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ABSTRACT
This study provides qualitative insights on the factors affecting the implementation of the plant clinic approach in Malawi from the viewpoint of plant doctors. Findings show that plant doctors perceive that the main benefit of plant clinics in Malawi has been the strengthening of local agricultural extension service systems in plant health disease diagnosis and pest management. The full potential of the plant clinic approach is, however, perceived as not being fully reached due to various challenges that include but are not limited to the scarcity of trained plant doctors coupled with the lack of sufficient resources to improve plant doctor mobility and to adequately access and use digital plant health resources. Some of these are being overcome through the embedding of the approach in national agricultural extension service systems and strategies, and integration with local plant health activities. For sustained implementation of plant clinics in Malawi, there is a need for continued policy, technical, and financial resources to support plant doctors to better utilize their knowledge to reach more farmers and to leverage digital technology to continuously broaden their plant health capacity through use of and access to mobile technology, digital plant health tools, and virtual plant health expert networks. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding for full details. This work was supported by UK International Development from the UK government; however, the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government's official policies. CABI is an international intergovernmental organisation, and we gratefully acknowledge the core financial support from our member countries (and lead agencies) including the United Kingdom (Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office), China (Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Australia (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research), Canada (Agriculture and Agri‐Food Canada), This could be rewritten as: Directorate‐General for International Cooperation (DGIS) within the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. See https://www.cabi.org/about‐cabi/who‐we‐work‐with/key‐donors/ ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2575-6265 2575-6265 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pei3.70056 |