Symmetry analysis for monitoring safety of newly marketed drugs

• Published in: Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 349 - 351
• Main Author: Kubota, Kiyoshi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2016; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Confounding Factors (Epidemiology); Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - epidemiology; Drugs; Humans; Patient safety; pharmacoepidemiology; Pharmacoepidemiology - methods; Pharmacoepidemiology - statistics & numerical data; Pharmacology; postmarketing drug surveillances; prescription sequence symmetry analysis; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing - methods; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing - statistics & numerical data; Research Design - statistics & numerical data; self-controlled design; symmetry analysis; prescription sequence symmetry analysis; symmetry analysis; self-controlled design; postmarketing drug surveillances; pharmacoepidemiology
• ISSN: 1053-8569; 1099-1557; 1099-1557
• DOI: 10.1002/pds.3886

Introduction A postmarketing study without a comparator group has been recognized as a problem as it provides no measure of association. Nevertheless, the design is sometimes used in company postmarketing studies particularly when the study involves the primary data collection. In this report, the “Symmetry Analysis Cohort Design” without a comparator group but with a control period is proposed. Methods and Results In the proposed design, the rate ratio is estimated using the method of prescription sequence symmetry analysis with slight modification so that the rate ratio can be estimated using data on subjects who have started the drug during the study period but no data on other subjects. Discussion The proposed design has an advantage that it can provide the measure of association. Another advantage common to all self‐controlled methods is that the effect of the measured and unmeasured confounders is automatically canceled out when the effect is stable over the study period. Compared with the standard design with a comparator group, the proposed design also has weaknesses. For example, adjustment of confounding by the indication may be difficult when the indication is an acute condition. In addition, the rate ratio is not valid when the probability of the prescription of the drug is dependent on the occurrence of the outcome in the unexposed (pre‐dose) period. The design may be used to evaluate the need for further studies although its real usefulness is to be determined in the future. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.