White Paper—Geriatric Emergency Medicine Education: Current State, Challenges, and Recommendations to Enhance the Emergency Care of Older Adults

Older adults account for 25% of all emergency department (ED) patient encounters. One in five Americans will be 65 or older by 2030. In response to this need, geriatric emergency medicine (GEM) has developed into a robust area of academic and clinical interest, with extensive evidence‐based research...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAEM education and training Vol. 2; no. Suppl Suppl 1; pp. S5 - S16
Main Authors Ringer, Thom, Dougherty, Megan, McQuown, Colleen, Melady, Don, Ouchi, Kei, Southerland, Lauren T., Hogan, Teresita M., Khandelwal, Sorabh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.12.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Older adults account for 25% of all emergency department (ED) patient encounters. One in five Americans will be 65 or older by 2030. In response to this need, geriatric emergency medicine (GEM) has developed into a robust area of academic and clinical interest, with extensive evidence‐based research and guidelines, including clear undergraduate and postgraduate GEM competencies. Despite these developments, GEM content remains underrepresented in curricula and licensing examinations. The complex reasons for these deficits include a perception that care of older adults is not a core emergency medicine (EM) competency, a disjunction between traditional definitions of expertise and the GEM perspective, and lack of curricular capacity. This White Paper, prepared on behalf of the Academy of Geriatric Emergency Medicine, describes the state of GEM education, identifies the challenges it faces, and reviews innovations, including research presented at the 2018 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Annual Scientific Meeting. The authors propose a number of recommendations. These include recognizing GEM as a core educational priority in EM, enhancing academic support for GEM clinician‐educators, using social learning and practical problem solving to teach GEM concepts, emphasizing a whole‐person multisystem approach to care of older adults, and identifying ageist attitudes as a hurdle to safe and effective GEM care.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
TH and DM are members of the Geriatric Emergency Department Collaborative, which is funded by the John A. Hartford and Gary and Mary West Foundations.
The authors have no potential conflicts to disclose.
ISSN:2472-5390
2472-5390
DOI:10.1002/aet2.10205