Serologic and fecal markers to predict response to induction therapy in dogs with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease

Background Little information is available of markers that assess the disease course in dogs with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Objectives Evaluate relationship between disease severity and serum and fecal biomarkers in dogs with idiopathic IBD before and after treatment. Animals Sixt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of veterinary internal medicine Vol. 32; no. 3; pp. 999 - 1008
Main Authors Otoni, Cristiane C., Heilmann, Romy M., García‐Sancho, Mercedes, Sainz, Angel, Ackermann, Mark R., Suchodolski, Jan S., Steiner, Jörg M., Jergens, Albert E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.05.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Little information is available of markers that assess the disease course in dogs with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Objectives Evaluate relationship between disease severity and serum and fecal biomarkers in dogs with idiopathic IBD before and after treatment. Animals Sixteen dogs with idioptahic IBD and 13 healthy dogs. Methods Prospective case control study. Canine IBD activity index (CIBDAI) clinical score, serum concentrations of C‐reactive protein (CRP), perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA), and serum and fecal canine calprotectin (cCP) were measured before and after 21 days of treatment. Results Serum CRP (median 3.5 mg/L; range: 0.1‐52.4 mg/L), fecal cCP (median 92.3 μg/g; range: 0.03‐637.5 μg/g), and CIBDAI scores significantly increased in dogs with IBD before treatment compared with serum CRP (median 0.2 mg/L; range: 0.1‐11.8 mg/L; P < .001), fecal cCP (median 0.67 μg/g; range: 0.03‐27.9 μg/g; P < .001) and CIBDAI (P < .001) after treatment. No significant associations between CIBDAI scores and before or after treatment serum biomarkers. There was a significant association between fecal cCP and CIBDAI scores before treatment (rho = 0.60, P = .01). CRP and fecal cCP significantly decreased after treatment (median 3.5 mg/L v. 0.2 mg/L; P < .001 and 92.3 μg/g v. 0.67 μg/g; P = .001, respectively). Conclusions and Clinical Importance Our data indicate that measurement of fecal cCP concentration is a useful biomarker for noninvasive evaluation of intestinal inflammation. Dogs with severe signs of GI disease more often have abnormal markers than dogs having less severe disease.
Bibliography:Funding information
Veterinary Clinical Sciences Incentive Grant, Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Grant/Award Number: 290‐05‐30 00‐0001
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Funding information Veterinary Clinical Sciences Incentive Grant, Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Grant/Award Number: 290‐05‐30 00‐0001
ISSN:0891-6640
1939-1676
DOI:10.1111/jvim.15123