Pilot-Scale Testing of UV-A Light Treatment for Mitigation of NH3, H2S, GHGs, VOCs, Odor, and O3 Inside the Poultry Barn

• Published in: Frontiers in chemistry Vol. 8; p. 613
• Main Authors: Lee, Myeongseong, Li, Peiyang, Koziel, Jacek A., Ahn, Heekwon, Wi, Jisoo, Chen, Baitong, Meiirkhanuly, Zhanibek, Banik, Chumki, Jenks, William S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A 31.07.2020
• Subjects: air pollution; ammonia; Chemistry; emissions; indoor air quality; odor; poultry production
• ISSN: 2296-2646; 2296-2646
• DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00613

Poultry farmers are producing eggs, meat, and feathers with increased efficiency and lower carbon footprint. Technologies to address concerns about the indoor air quality inside barns and the gaseous emissions from farms to the atmosphere continue to be among industry priorities. We have been developing and scaling up a UV air treatment that has the potential to reduce odor and other gases on the farm scale. In our recent laboratory-scale study, the use of UV-A (a less toxic ultraviolet light, a.k.a. “black light”) and a special TiO 2 -based photocatalyst reduced concentrations of several important air pollutants (NH 3 , CO 2 , N 2 O, O 3 ) without impact on H 2 S and CH 4 . Therefore, the objectives of this research were to (1) scale up the UV treatment to pilot scale, (2) evaluate the mitigation of odor and odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and (3) complete preliminary economic analyses. A pilot-scale experiment was conducted under commercial poultry barn conditions to evaluate photocatalyst coatings on surfaces subjected to UV light under field conditions. In this study, the reactor was constructed to support interchangeable wall panels and installed on a poultry farm. The effects of a photocatalyst's presence (photocatalysis and photolysis), UV intensity (LED and fluorescent), and treatment time were studied in the pilot-scale experiments inside a poultry barn. The results of the pilot-scale experiments were consistent with the laboratory-scale one: the percent reduction under photocatalysis was generally higher than photolysis. In addition, the percent reduction of target gases at a high light intensity and long treatment time was higher. The percent reduction of NH 3 was 5–9%. There was no impact on H 2 S, CH 4 , and CO 2 under any experimental conditions. N 2 O and O 3 concentrations were reduced at 6–12% and 87–100% by both photolysis and photocatalysis. In addition, concentrations of several VOCs responsible for livestock odor were reduced from 26 to 62% and increased with treatment time and light intensity. The odor was reduced by 18%. Photolysis treatment reduced concentrations of N 2 O, VOCs, and O 3 , only. The initial economic analysis has shown that LEDs are more efficient than fluorescent lights. Further scale-up and research at farm scale are warranted.