Uneven-aged management options to promote forest resilience for climate change adaptation: effects of group selection and harvesting intensity

• Published in: Annals of forest science (Print) Vol. 71; no. 2; pp. 173 - 186
• Main Authors: Lafond, Valentine, Lagarrigues, Guillaume, Cordonnier, Thomas, Courbaud, Benoît
• Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: Paris Springer-Verlag 01.03.2014; Springer Paris; EDP Sciences; Springer Nature (since 2011)/EDP Science (until 2010)
• Subjects: algorithms; arsenic; Biological and medical sciences; Biomedical and Life Sciences; climate change; drought; Environment; Forestry; Forestry Management; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; group effect; group size; harvesting; Life Sciences; managers; mixed forests; Original Paper; silviculture; Tree Biology; trees; uneven-aged management; wood; Wood Science & Technology; Uneven-aged selection forest; Thinning and harvesting algorithm; Forest resilience; Forest dynamics modeling; Climate change adaptation; Forests; Harvesting; Selection cutting; Uneven aged forest stand; Vegetation dynamics; Algorithm; Modeling; Resilience; Dynamical climatology; Climate change; Forestry; Selection forest; Group selection; Adaptation; CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION; UNEVEN-AGED SELECTION FOREST; FOREST RESILIENCE; FOREST DYNAMICS MODELING; THINNING AND HARVESTING ALGORITHM
• ISSN: 1286-4560; 1297-966X
• DOI: 10.1007/s13595-013-0291-y

CONTEXT : Climate change is expected to increase forest vulnerability through disturbances such as windstorms and droughts. Forest managers are therefore investigating strategies to increase forest resistance and resilience, especially by promoting uneven-aged and mixed forests through group selection, and by reducing stand stocking and large trees proportion. However, there is little information on the long-term impacts of these two practices. AIMS : The objectives of this study were (1) to develop an original silviculture algorithm designed for uneven-aged management and (2) to use it to assess the effects of the above-mentioned management methods in long-term simulations. METHODS : We simulated individual and group selection techniques in order to study the effects of group size, harvesting intensity and their interactions on wood production, stand heterogeneity, and regeneration in mountain spruce–fir forests. We used the spatially explicit individual-based forest model Samsara2 to simulate forest dynamics. RESULTS : Our simulation results confirmed the positive effect of group selection practices on structure diversity and regeneration but not on spruce maintenance. Increasing harvesting intensity enabled forest destocking but decreased structure diversity and led to non-sustained yields for the most intensive scenarios. CONCLUSION : As adaptation measure, we thus recommend moderate group selection harvesting creating 500 m² gaps.