Batch operation of a microbial fuel cell equipped with alternative proton exchange membrane

• Published in: International journal of hydrogen energy Vol. 40; no. 48; pp. 17323 - 17331
• Main Authors: Hernández-Flores, G., Poggi-Varaldo, H.M., Solorza-Feria, O., Romero-Castañón, T., Ríos-Leal, E., Galíndez-Mayer, J., Esparza-García, F.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 28.12.2015
• Subjects: Batch operation; Leachate; Low cost membrane; Microbial fuel cell; Proton exchange membrane; Microbial fuel cell; Low cost membrane; Proton exchange membrane; Leachate; Batch operation
• ISSN: 0360-3199; 1879-3487
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.057

We compared the effect of membrane type on the performance of microbial fuel cells (MFC) fed with an actual leachate and operated in batch for 15 days. The tested proton exchange membranes (PEMs) were Nafion 117 (NF) and a low cost membrane (LCM). The cell equipped with LCM outperformed the one equipped with NF. In the first period of the batch, 0–8 d, average volumetric powers (PV) were 9000 and 4000 mW/m3 for the MFC equipped with LCM and NF, respectively. In the second period (8–15 d) when the external resistances were adjusted, the average PVs were 20 000 and 6800 mW/m3 for LCM and NF, respectively. At the end of the batch, deposits of dry salts appeared on the external side of the cathode carbon cloth of the cell equipped with NF. Likely, this could be related to the decrease of power output in the last days of the batch (11–15 d) in the cell equipped with NF. •We compared the effect of membrane type on the batch operation performance of MFC.•Nafion 117 (NF) and a low cost proton exchange membrane (LCM) were tested.•The fuel was an actual leachate from Mexico city sanitary landfill.•The cell equipped with LCM outperformed the one equipped with NF.•Salt deposits appeared on the cathode carbon cloth of NF-equipped MFC.