Relationship of sperm small heat-shock protein 10 and voltage-dependent anion channel 2 with semen freezability in boars

• Published in: Theriogenology Vol. 82; no. 3; pp. 418 - 426
• Main Authors: Vilagran, Ingrid, Yeste, Marc, Sancho, Sílvia, Casas, Isabel, Rivera del Álamo, Maria M., Bonet, Sergi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2014
• Subjects: Animals; Biomarkers - metabolism; Boar sperm; Chaperonin 10 - genetics; Chaperonin 10 - metabolism; Cryopreservation; Cryopreservation - methods; Cryopreservation - veterinary; Freezability marker; Heat-Shock Proteins, Small - genetics; Heat-Shock Proteins, Small - metabolism; Male; ODF1/HSPB10; Regression Analysis; Semen Preservation - methods; Semen Preservation - veterinary; Sperm Motility; Spermatozoa - physiology; Swine - physiology; VDAC2; Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel 2 - genetics; Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel 2 - metabolism; VDAC2; Freezability marker; Cryopreservation; Boar sperm; ODF1/HSPB10
• ISSN: 0093-691X; 1879-3231
• DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.04.023

Freezability differences between boar ejaculates exist, but there is no useful method to predict the ejaculate freezability before sperm cryopreservation takes place. In this context, the present study sought to determine whether the amounts of small heat-shock protein 10 (also known as outer dense fiber protein 1) (ODF1/HSPB10) and voltage-dependent anion channel 2 (VDAC2) may be used as boar sperm freezability markers. With this aim, 26 boar ejaculates were split into two fractions: one for protein extraction and the other for cryopreservation purposes. Ejaculates were subsequently classified into two groups (good freezability ejaculates [GFE] and poor freezability ejaculates [PFE]) based on viability and sperm motility assessments after 30 and 240 minutes of after thawing. Although the VDAC2 amounts, analyzed through Western blot, were significantly higher (P < 0.01) in GFE (1.15 ± 0.18 density mm2) than in PFE (0.16 ± 0.03 density mm2), no significant differences were observed in ODF1/HSPB10 between both groups (i.e., 1.97 ± 0.38 density mm2 in GFE vs. 1.87 ± 1.54 density mm2 in PFE). In addition, principal component and multiple regression analyses indicated that the component explaining most of the variance (78.41%) in ejaculate freezability at 240 minutes after thawing resulted to be significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with VDAC2 content. This result revealed that the amounts of VDAC2 but not those of ODF1/HSPB10 may be used to predict the freezability of a given boar ejaculate before starting cryopreservation procedures.