Reliability of Markerless Motion Capture Systems for Assessing Movement Screenings

• Published in: Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine Vol. 12; no. 3; p. 23259671241234339
• Main Authors: Hauenstein, Jonathan D., Huebner, Alan, Wagle, John P., Cobian, Emma R., Cummings, Joseph, Hills, Caroline, McGinty, Megan, Merritt, Mandy, Rosengarten, Sam, Skinner, Kyle, Szemborski, Michael, Wojtkiewicz, Leigh
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.03.2024; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Kinematics; Motion capture; Original Research; kinematic variables; interrater reliability; intrarater reliability; markerless motion capture; movement screening
• ISSN: 2325-9671; 2325-9671
• DOI: 10.1177/23259671241234339

Background: Movement screenings are commonly used to detect unfavorable movement patterns. Markerless motion capture systems have been developed to track 3-dimensional motion. Purpose: To determine the reliability of movement screenings assessed using a markerless motion capture system when comparing the results of multiple systems and multiple collection periods. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: The inter- and intrarater reliability of a commercially available markerless motion capture system were investigated in 21 recreationally active participants aged between 18 and 22 years. A total of 39 kinematic variables arising from 10 fundamental upper and lower body movements typical of a screening procedure in sports performance were considered. The data were statistically analyzed in terms of relative error via the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and absolute error via the residual standard error (RSE). Results: Both inter- and intrarater reliability ICCs were at least moderate across all variables (ICC, >0.50), with most movements and corresponding variables having excellent reliability (ICC, >0.90). Although maximum knee valgus angles were the kinematic variables with the lowest interrater reliability (ICCs, 0.59-0.82) and moderate relative agreement, there was agreement in absolute terms with an RSE of <1.3°. Conclusion: Findings indicated that markerless motion capture provides reliable measurements of joint position during a movement screen, which allows for a more objective evaluation of the direction and subsequent success of interventions. However, practitioners should consider relative and absolute agreements when applying information provided by these systems. Clinical Relevance: Markerless motion capture systems may assist clinicians by reliably assessing movement screenings using different systems over different collection periods.