Resolution and geometric limitations in laser powder bed fusion additively manufactured GRCop-84 structures for a lower hybrid current drive launcher

•Laser Powder Bed Fusion additive manufacturing enables rapid construction of lower hybrid launchers for fusion reactors.•Surface roughness depends on print angle, 45° overhangs do not require supports.•0.5 mm thick walls warp during the print process, 1 and 1.5 mm thick walls eliminates warping.•Si...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFusion engineering and design Vol. 173; no. C; p. 112847
Main Authors Seltzman, A.H., Wukitch, S.J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.12.2021
Elsevier Science Ltd
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Laser Powder Bed Fusion additive manufacturing enables rapid construction of lower hybrid launchers for fusion reactors.•Surface roughness depends on print angle, 45° overhangs do not require supports.•0.5 mm thick walls warp during the print process, 1 and 1.5 mm thick walls eliminates warping.•Sinusoidal motion of the build plate induced a 5 mm period 40 μm pk-pk surface waviness.•.Dimensional accuracy was within 40 μm, batch-to-batch variation was 10 μm. Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF), also known as Selective Laser MeltingTM (SLMTM), allows additive manufacture of lower hybrid current drive (LHCD) Radio Frequency (RF) launchers from a new material, Glenn Research Copper 84 (GRCop-84), a Cr2Nb (8 at. % Cr, 4 at. % Nb) precipitation hardened alloy, in configurations unachievable with conventional machining. The resolution and geometric limitations are tested to explore the limitations of L-PBF printing of GRCop-84. Printing holes in the vertical and horizontal direction are examined to determine the minimum cooling channel diameter. Internal stress limits the minimum thickness of vertical walls and septa to 1 mm, thinner walls warp during printing. Roughness is minimized on vertical surfaces and increases on both upper and lower surfaces as angle increases. Accuracy within 40 μm is typical on well supported structures.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
FC02-04ER54698; DMR-14-19807
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Fusion Energy Sciences (FES)
ISSN:0920-3796
1873-7196
DOI:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112847