Comparable long-term mortality risk associated with individual sulfonylureas in diabetes patients with heart failure

Abstract Aims The aim was to investigate the outcomes of individual sulfonylureas in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods All patients hospitalized with HF for the first time in 1997–2006, alive 30 days after discharge, and who received anti-diabetic monotherapy with glimepiride ( n = 1097), gl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes research and clinical practice Vol. 94; no. 1; pp. 119 - 125
Main Authors Andersson, Charlotte, Gislason, Gunnar H, Jørgensen, Casper H, Hansen, Peter R, Vaag, Allan, Sørensen, Rikke, Mérie, Charlotte, Olesen, Jonas B, Weeke, Peter, Schmiegelow, Michelle, Norgaard, Mette L, Køber, Lars, Torp-Pedersen, Christian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.10.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Aims The aim was to investigate the outcomes of individual sulfonylureas in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods All patients hospitalized with HF for the first time in 1997–2006, alive 30 days after discharge, and who received anti-diabetic monotherapy with glimepiride ( n = 1097), glibenclamide (glyburide) ( n = 1031), glipizide ( n = 557), gliclazide ( n = 251), or tolbutamide ( n = 541) were identified from nationwide registers. Risk of all-cause mortality was assessed by multivariable Cox regression models. Results Over the median observational time of 744 (Inter Quartile Range 268–1451) days, 2242 patients (64%) died. The analysis demonstrated similar hazard ratio (HR) for mortality for treatment with glimepiride (1.10 [95% confidence interval 0.92–1.33]), glibenclamide (1.12 [0.93–1.34]), glipizide (1.14 [0.93–1.38]), tolbutamide (1.04 [0.85–1.26]), and gliclazide (reference). Grouped according to pancreatic specificity, i.e., with tolbutamide, glipizide, and gliclazide as specific, and glibenclamide, and glimepiride as non-specific agents, no differential prognosis was found between the two groups (HR 1.04 [0.96–1.14], for non-specific, compared to pancreas specific agents). The prognosis was not dependent on prior acute myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease ( p for interactions >0.3). Conclusions In current clinical practice, it is unlikely that there are considerable differences in risk of mortality associated with individual sulfonylureas in patients with heart failure.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0168-8227
1872-8227
DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.07.011