Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil Improves Survival of Patients with Advanced Esophageal Cancer Compared with Conventional Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil

To compare treatment outcomes and adverse events between concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF-RT) and conventional concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF-RT). We retrospectively investigated treatment outcomes and adverse events...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Cancer Vol. 9; no. 16; pp. 2765 - 2772
Main Authors Tamaki, Yukihisa, Hieda, Yoko, Nakajima, Masanobu, Kitajima, Kazuhiro, Yoshida, Rika, Yoshizako, Takeshi, Ue, Atsushi, Tokudo, Mutsumi, Hirahara, Noriyuki, Moriyama, Ichiro, Kato, Hiroyuki, Inomata, Taisuke
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Australia Ivyspring International Publisher 01.01.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1837-9664
1837-9664
DOI10.7150/jca.23456

Cover

More Information
Summary:To compare treatment outcomes and adverse events between concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF-RT) and conventional concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF-RT). We retrospectively investigated treatment outcomes and adverse events in 121 patients with advanced esophageal cancer who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy with CF-RT (n = 83) or DCF-RT (n = 38). In the CF-RT group, patients were administered cisplatin (70 mg/m ) and 5-fluorouracil (700 mg/m ) for 5 days; in the DCF-RT group, patients were administered docetaxel (50 mg/m ), cisplatin (50 mg/m ), and 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m ) for 5 days. The radiotherapy dose was 1.8-2 Gy per session, up to a total of 50-60 Gy. The complete response (CR) rate was 37.8% in the CF-RT group and 52.6% in the DCF-RT group. Overall survival (OS) rates at 2 and 3 years were 45.0% and 37.5%, respectively, in the CF-RT group and 62.9% and 56.7%, respectively, in the DCF-RT group, with a significant intergroup difference (p = 0.032). Progression-free survival rates at 2 and 3 years were 44.1% and 36.9%, respectively, in the CF-RT group and 45.0% and 45.0%, respectively, in the DCF-RT group (p = 0.10). Local control rates at 2 and 3 years were 59.1% and 54.6%, respectively, in the CF-RT group and 71.8% and 71.8%, respectively, in the DCF-RT group (p = 0.12). The incidence of Grade 3/4 leukopenia was 55.4% (n = 46) in the CF-RT group and 78.9% (n = 30) in the DCF-RT group, with a significant intergroup difference (p = 0.022). The incidence of Grade 3/4 neutropenia was 47.0% (n = 39) in the CF-RT group and 65.8% (n = 25) in the DCF-RT group, with a notable albeit not statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.054). There were no significant intergroup differences in anemia, thrombocytopenia, radiation-induced dermatitis, radiation esophagitis, or late adverse events. Rates of OS and CR were improved after treatment with DCF-RT compared with CF-RT. Although DCF-RT-treated patients had higher rates of leukopenia, treatment safety was ensured through proper management of myelotoxicity. DCF-RT is a promising treatment regimen for advanced esophageal cancer.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
ISSN:1837-9664
1837-9664
DOI:10.7150/jca.23456