Effects of protein level and fat/oil on emulsion stability, texture, microstructure and color of meat batters

Beef meat batters formulated with increasing protein level (10–15%) and containing 25% beef fat were compared to batters prepared with 25% canola oil. Emulsion stability of the canola oil treatments was higher (less separation during cooking) at the 10–13% protein level compared to the beef fat trea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMeat science Vol. 82; no. 2; pp. 228 - 233
Main Authors Youssef, M.K., Barbut, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2009
[Amsterdam]: Elsevier Science
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Beef meat batters formulated with increasing protein level (10–15%) and containing 25% beef fat were compared to batters prepared with 25% canola oil. Emulsion stability of the canola oil treatments was higher (less separation during cooking) at the 10–13% protein level compared to the beef fat treatments. However, above 13% protein this was reversed and the canola oil treatments showed high fat and liquid separation, which did not occur at all in the beef fat treatments. This indicates differences in stabilization of fat versus oil in such meat emulsions. Hardness of the cooked meat batters showed significantly ( P < 0.05) higher values when the protein level was raised, and was higher in canola oil than in beef fat meat emulsions at similar protein levels. Products’ chewiness were higher in the canola oil treatments compared to the beef fat emulsions. Lightness decreased and redness increased in canola oil batters as the protein level was raised. The micrographs revealed the formation of larger fat globules in the beef fat emulsions compared to the canola oil meat emulsions. The canola oil treatment with 14% protein started to show fat globule coalescence, which could be related to the reduced emulsion stability.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.01.015
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0309-1740
1873-4138
DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.01.015