Patient‐level meta‐analysis of 999 claudicants undergoing primary femoropopliteal nitinol stent implantation
Condensed The factors that impact the clinical effectiveness of bare nitinol stents in claudicants with symptomatic femoropopliteal atherosclerosis are incompletely known. The authors analyzed variables that may influence stent durability and provide a benchmark for their effectiveness. Data analyze...
Saved in:
Published in | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions Vol. 89; no. 7; pp. 1250 - 1256 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.06.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Condensed
The factors that impact the clinical effectiveness of bare nitinol stents in claudicants with symptomatic femoropopliteal atherosclerosis are incompletely known. The authors analyzed variables that may influence stent durability and provide a benchmark for their effectiveness. Data analyzed from six studies (999 patients) included baseline noninvasive hemodynamic tests, angiographic characteristics, ultrasound defined stent patency and target lesion revascularization through 12‐months. Baseline ankle‐brachial index and lesion length predicted stent patency and target lesion revascularization and when combined interacted significantly to better predict outcomes. This meta‐analysis provides an important comparator against which emerging therapies that treat claudicants with femoropopliteal atherosclerosis can be assessed.
Subject Code
Peripheral Artery Disease
Background
The performance of bare metal nitinol stents in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease (PAD) is not well defined.
Methods
Patient‐level data from six large prospective trials sponsored by medical device manufacturers was ed and analyzed to identify a cohort of patients with claudication and femoropopliteal artery occlusive disease. Twelve‐month binary patency and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates were primary outcomes. Stent patency was assessed by duplex ultrasonography (DUS) and TLR was a clinically driven intervention. To characterize the effects of patient characteristics on the outcomes, meta‐regression was performed via mixed effects logistic regression models with patient‐level covariates.
Results
About 999 patients were analyzed; the mean ABI was 0.68 ± 0.18, the mean lesion length was 84 ± 53 mm, the mean lesion stenosis was 78%, and nearly two thirds of patients had mild to severe calcification. The mean Rutherford clinical category was 2.7 ± 0.6 and ranged from 2.6 to 2.8 in all studies. The 12‐month patency across all studies was 69.8% and TLR rates ranged from 9.2% to 19.7%. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that baseline ABI and baseline target lesion length predicted both primary patency and TLR. Further, these two variables interacted significantly to better predict TLR outcomes when used in combination.
Conclusion
The 12‐month clinical effectiveness of bare nitinol stents to treat patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal PAD is acceptable and is impacted by clinical and lesion‐specific characteristics. These data provide an important and useful benchmark to compare the clinical benefit of emerging endovascular PAD therapies. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Relationships with Industry The editor's choice video can be viewed online at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-726X/homepage/cci_editor_s_choice_papers_and_videos.htm . KRS is consultant for Medtronic, Alucent, Amgen, BioMet, ROX Medical, TVA Medical and a compensated Board Member of VIVA Physician, a 501 c 3 not‐for‐profit education and research organization; JAB is consultant for Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Astra Zeneca, EMX, Janacare; GA is a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific Corp., Cardinal Health, WL Gore, Abbott Vascular, Cook Medical and Veryan; SPL is a consultant for Spectranetics, Biomet and TriVascular; PS is a compensated Board Member of VIVA Physician, a 501 c 3 not‐for‐profit education and research organization; MM is a consultant for Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, Bolton Medical, Endologix, Boston Scientific Corp, and Gore and Associates; MD is a consultant for Cook Medical and Gore and Associates; MRJ is a noncompensated consultant to Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Cordis Corporation and Medtronic; he is a compensated consultant to Cardinal Health, Volcano Phillips, AOPA. He is a compensated Board Member of VIVA Physician, a 501 c 3 not‐for‐profit education and research organization. K.J. Rocha‐Singh and J.A. Beckman contributed equally to this manuscript. ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
DOI: | 10.1002/ccd.27029 |