Revisiting ‘intensive’ blood glucose control: A causal directed acyclic graph‐guided systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Aim To clarify the importance of HbA1c reduction and antidiabetic drug use in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and Methods We conducted an updated systematic review of contemporary large randomized controlled trials assessing th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes, obesity & metabolism Vol. 24; no. 12; pp. 2341 - 2352
Main Authors Huang, Chi‐Jung, Wang, Wei‐Ting, Sung, Shih‐Hsien, Chen, Chen‐Huan, Lip, Gregory Y. H., Cheng, Hao‐Min, Chiang, Chern‐En
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim To clarify the importance of HbA1c reduction and antidiabetic drug use in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and Methods We conducted an updated systematic review of contemporary large randomized controlled trials assessing the relative efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drugs with less hypoglycaemia risk in adult T2D patients. Mixed‐effects meta‐regression was performed to examine the associations of HbA1c reduction with subsequent risk of macrovascular and microvascular events. We evaluated the potential mediating role of HbA1c reduction in the relationship between antidiabetic drugs and MACE. Results Eighteen placebo‐controlled trials comprising 155 610 participants were included. The effects of treatment differed among antidiabetic drug classes for most adverse outcomes with high heterogeneity (I2: 63.7%‐95.8%). Mean HbA1c reduction was lowest with dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors (0.30%), followed by sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors (0.46%), and was highest with glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (0.58%) and thiazolidinediones (0.60%). Lower relative risks of MACE were significantly associated with larger reductions in achieved HbA1c (β −0.3182; 95% CI: −0.5366 to −0.0998; P = .0043), even after adjusting for drug classes. When considering HbA1c lowering as a mediator to be controlled, beneficial effects owing to specific antidiabetic treatment for MACE were not observed (χ2 = 1.4494; P = .6940). The proportion mediated by HbA1c reduction was 50.0%‐63.5% for these antidiabetic agents. Conclusions The main benefits of antidiabetic agents might result from the reduction in blood sugar levels and are generally independent of drugs used. Risk reduction in MACE was proportional to the magnitude of HbA1c decrease conferred by antidiabetic agents with less hypoglycaemic hazard.
Bibliography:Funding information
This work received grants from the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW104‐TDU‐B‐211‐113‐003, MOHW106‐TDU‐B‐211‐113001), an intramural grant from National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (E107F‐M01‐0501) and Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 106‐2314‐B‐075‐051‐MY3, MOST 109‐2314‐B‐010‐061). This work is particularly supported by the ‘Yin Yen‐Liang Foundation Development and Construction Plan’ of the School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University. The funders of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report.
Chi‐Jung Huang and Wei‐Ting Wang are co‐first authors.
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.14819