How safe is metabolic/diabetes surgery?

Although recent studies have shown the impressive antidiabetic effects of laparoscopic Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), the safety profile of metabolic/diabetes surgery has been a matter of concern among patients and physicians. Data on patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent LRYGB or one of se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes, obesity & metabolism Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 198 - 201
Main Authors Aminian, A., Brethauer, S. A., Kirwan, J. P., Kashyap, S. R., Burguera, B., Schauer, P. R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although recent studies have shown the impressive antidiabetic effects of laparoscopic Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), the safety profile of metabolic/diabetes surgery has been a matter of concern among patients and physicians. Data on patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent LRYGB or one of seven other procedures between January 2007 and December 2012 were retrieved from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and compared. Of the 66 678 patients included, 16 509 underwent LRYGB. The composite complication rate of 3.4% after LRYGB was similar to those of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hysterectomy. The mortality rate for LRYGB (0.3%) was similar to that of knee arthroplasty. Patients who underwent LRYGB had significantly better short‐term outcomes in all examined variables than patients who underwent coronary bypass, infra‐inguinal revascularization and laparoscopic colectomy. In conclusion, LRYGB can be considered a safe procedure in people with diabetes, with similar short‐term morbidity to that of common procedures such as cholecystectomy and appendectomy and a mortality rate similar to that of knee arthroplasty. The mortality risk for LRYGB is one‐tenth that of cardiovascular surgery and earlier intervention with metabolic surgery to treat diabetes may eliminate the need for some later higher‐risk procedures to treat diabetes complications.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-LWTCQ4VS-P
ArticleID:DOM12405
istex:00436DCEC647197DDEA578861645D169EDB0EDEE
Table S1. Baseline characteristics of diabetic patients who underwent gastric bypass and other types of surgery (N = 66 678).Figure S1. Composite Complication Rate (%) (Green bar indicates comparative values with that of gastric bypass. Red bar indicates significantly different value than that of gastric bypass).Figure S2. Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay (mean) (Green bar indicates comparative values with that of gastric bypass. Red bar indicates significantly different value than that of gastric bypass).Figure S3. Readmission Rate (%) (Green bar indicates comparative values with that of gastric bypass. Red bar indicates significantly different value than that of gastric bypass).Figure S4. Reoperation Rate (%) (Green bar indicates comparative values with that of gastric bypass. Red bar indicates significantly different value than that of gastric bypass).Figure S5. Mortality Rate (%) (Green bar indicates comparative values with that of gastric bypass. Red bar indicates significantly different value than that of gastric bypass).
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.12405