Blind instrument response function identification from fluorescence decays

Time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy plays a crucial role when studying dynamic properties of complex photochemical systems. Nevertheless, the analysis of measured time decays and the extraction of exponential lifetimes often requires either the experimental assessment or the modeling of the inst...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiophysical reports Vol. 4; no. 2; p. 100155
Main Authors Gómez-Sánchez, Adrián, Devos, Olivier, Vitale, Raffaele, Sliwa, Michel, Sakhapov, Damir, Enderlein, Jörg, de Juan, Anna, Ruckebusch, Cyril
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 12.06.2024
Cell Press
Elsevier
SeriesBiophys Rep (N Y)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy plays a crucial role when studying dynamic properties of complex photochemical systems. Nevertheless, the analysis of measured time decays and the extraction of exponential lifetimes often requires either the experimental assessment or the modeling of the instrument response function (IRF). However, the intrinsic nature of the IRF in the measurement process, which may vary across measurements due to chemical and instrumental factors, jeopardizes the results obtained by reconvolution approaches. In this paper, we introduce a novel methodology, called blind instrument response function identification (BIRFI), which enables the direct estimation of the IRF from the collected data. It capitalizes on the properties of single exponential signals to transform a deconvolution problem into a well-posed system identification problem. To delve into the specifics, we provide a step-by-step description of the BIRFI method and a protocol for its application to fluorescence decays. The performance of BIRFI is evaluated using simulated and time-correlated single-photon counting data. Our results demonstrate that the BIRFI methodology allows an accurate recovery of the IRF, yielding comparable or even superior results compared with those obtained with experimental IRFs when they are used for reconvolution by parametric model fitting.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:2667-0747
2667-0747
DOI:10.1016/j.bpr.2024.100155