interaction between elevational gradient and substratum reveals how bryophytes respond to the climate

QUESTIONS: Why does bryophyte richness increase along the elevational gradient? Even though a number of studies have documented the peculiar positive (or hump‐shaped) relationship between species richness and elevation in bryophytes, it is still unclear which underlying mechanisms cause the patter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of vegetation science Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 844 - 853
Main Author Spitale, Daniel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.07.2016
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:QUESTIONS: Why does bryophyte richness increase along the elevational gradient? Even though a number of studies have documented the peculiar positive (or hump‐shaped) relationship between species richness and elevation in bryophytes, it is still unclear which underlying mechanisms cause the pattern. LOCATION: Norway spruce forests, Italian Alps, South Tyrol. METHODS: Eight gradients from 900 to 1900 m a.s.l. and three different substrata (forest floor, deadwood, tree trunks) were examined. Three responses from the bryophyte communities were analysed: species richness of mosses and liverworts, functional diversity (considering the morphological characteristics of species) and β‐diversity (separating the two components: richness difference and species turnover). RESULTS: On deadwood and tree trunks a quadratic relationship was found between bryophyte richness and elevation, but not on the forest floor. On all three substrata, the moss assemblages along the elevational gradient were dominated by the turnover process and not by the richness component of β‐diversity. In liverworts, the two components of β‐diversity were equally important. Temperature was the most important predictor of bryophyte richness, whereas model selection suggested that temperature, solar radiation and rainfall had equal effects on functional diversity. CONCLUSIONS: The substrata affect the response of bryophytes to the elevational gradient. The bryophyte assemblages inhabiting the forest floor, being less subject to climatic variability than deadwood and tree trunks, could be less affected by the temperature increase where climate change is occurring.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12403
Appendix S1. The study was carried out on the Italian Alps in South Tyrol.Appendix S2. Variation of temperature, annual solar radiation, annual precipitation and canopy closure on the three elevational steps (submontane, montane and subalpine).Appendix S3. Generalized Linear Mixed Models for moss and liverwort species richness with factors elevation (elev) and substrata (subst) and plot nested in elevation.Appendix S4. Non Metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) of samples on the Ružička dissimilarity matrix used to partition total β diversity: β total = β turnover + β richness.
Autonomous Province of Bolzano
ark:/67375/WNG-5WSZFKP3-3
ArticleID:JVS12403
istex:D4C915F5B453A8689B719956BA78B8C7C2C2AC52
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1100-9233
1654-1103
DOI:10.1111/jvs.12403