Evaluation of a digital drainage system (Thopaz) in over 250 cases at a single site: A retrospective case‐control study

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Thopaz system, a new drainage system in management of general thoracic surgery, based on a review of our clinical practice and a comparison of the utility of the Thopaz device compared with a standard drainage system. Methods A review...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe clinical respiratory journal Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 1454 - 1459
Main Authors Arai, Hiromasa, Tajiri, Michihiko, Kameda, Yohei, Shiino, Kimihisa, Ando, Kohei, Okudela, Koji, Masuda, Munetaka
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.04.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Thopaz system, a new drainage system in management of general thoracic surgery, based on a review of our clinical practice and a comparison of the utility of the Thopaz device compared with a standard drainage system. Methods A review of 540 thoracic surgeries at our hospital was performed. These cases were divided into 275 treated with the Thopaz system from April 2014 to March 2015 and 265 treated with a standard system from April 2013 to March 2014. The characteristics of patients and outcomes after surgery were compared in these 2 groups. Results The characteristics of the patients were similar in the 2 groups. Outcomes after surgery, including types of operation, period of chest tube placement, chest tube reinsertion rate and clamping test rate also did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions The non‐inferiority of the Thopaz system compared to a standard system was verified statistically. With advantages of providing objective data as a small portable system, in addition to the quietness of the unit and the ease of setup and operation, Thopaz system is likely to become mainstream in postoperative management in general thoracic surgery.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1752-6981
1752-699X
DOI:10.1111/crj.12683